为了正常的体验网站,请在浏览器设置里面开启Javascript功能!

股权论文:股权 股东资格 隐名股东 股权继承

2017-10-22 5页 doc 23KB 39阅读

用户头像

is_219945

暂无简介

举报
股权论文:股权 股东资格 隐名股东 股权继承股权论文:股权 股东资格 隐名股东 股权继承 股权论文:股权 股东资格 隐名股东 股权继承 【中文摘要】隐名投资现象的不断增多,使名目繁多的有关隐名股东权益问题所引起的纠纷接连不断,困惑难解。而有关有限责任公司隐名股东股权继承问题的出现,势必会面临新的困惑与疑问。一方面,法律没有对隐名股东作出明确的规定,对于隐名股东的股东资格该如何界定,学术界目前还处于比较混乱,争论不休的局面。另一方面,《公司法》对股权继承问题的规定,显得抽象概括也不够严密,使司法界与学术界仍旧各持观点,没能形成一个统一的操作标准。这种状况,面对隐名股东...
股权论文:股权 股东资格 隐名股东 股权继承
股权:股权 股东资格 隐名股东 股权继承 股权论文:股权 股东资格 隐名股东 股权继承 【中文摘要】隐名投资现象的不断增多,使名目繁多的有关隐名股东权益问所引起的纠纷接连不断,困惑难解。而有关有限责任公司隐名股东股权继承问题的出现,势必会面临新的困惑与疑问。一方面,法律没有对隐名股东作出明确的规定,对于隐名股东的股东资格该如何界定,学术界目前还处于比较混乱,争论不休的局面。另一方面,《公司法》对股权继承问题的规定,显得抽象概括也不够严密,使司法界与学术界仍旧各持观点,没能形成一个统一的操作标准。这种状况,面对隐名股东的股权可否继承这个问题时,还是找不到比较准确的法律依据和对应的基础理论。本文笔者通过案例,针对案例本身需要界定清楚的相关问题,理论联系实际,层层展开,意图找到一个合理有效的处理有关有限责任公司隐名股东股权继承问题的,这是本文的核心内容。在此基础上笔者期望同时能够建立起一套行之有效的法律体系,以应对因隐名投资而引起的纷繁复杂的纠纷,规范经济市场。本文主要分为以下四个部分展开论述,共计大约20000字第一部分从写作本文的初衷入手,说明了写作此问题之缘起。首先对改编案例的基本情况做了概括介绍,以案例所针对的焦点问题为主线,通过对案例争议焦点的分析,提出处理此案急需界定清楚的相关问题。第二部分对股东资格认定相关的问题做了基本论证。先对股权性质、股东资格的内涵及其与股东相互间的关系做了厘定,在对此问题分析的基础上,得出-般情况下股东确权应满足的基本条件,依此为絮机理清 股东资格认定的应然标准。为处理与此相关纠纷提供参照标准及价值 取向。第三部分是对隐名股东确权问题的核心分析,是本文需要理清 的重点与难点问题。通过对隐名股东基本内涵与外延的诠释,明了隐 名股东的性质。借鉴当前立法、理论界与实务界应对隐名股东问题的 思路,依此启发,通过对当前主流学说的考量,推出确认隐名股东资格 认定的具体思路。第四部分是对隐名股东股权继承问题的阐述分析。 首先对股权继承相关的问题做了综述,分析规范化的股权继承;再依 前面的论断为基础,结合股东资格认定的标准,对隐名股东股权继承 需要满足的要件做了分析,据此确立隐名股东股权继承的途径,希望 为以后司法实践中遇到相同或类似的案例提供一些理论上的支撑。本 文笔者以案例分析为基础,结合学理和司法实践对案例进行综合探析, 试图找出对隐名股东资格认定及股权继承具有普遍指导意义的规则 与具体思路。 【英文摘要】The number of dormant investment increase gradually recently which leads to the dispute on many sorts of dormant partners’interests continuously and it is hard to resolve. Along with the problem of inheritance of dormant partners from limited liability companies, it tends to be confronted with new confusion and interrogation. On the one hand, the concept of dormant partners is not defined clearly by law, and how to define it is still a controversial issue in the academic world. On the other hand, the provisions about stock equity in the Company Law seem to be abstract and imprecise, which results in a situation that the legal professionals and academic world both different view about that and fails to achieve uniform standard. Under this circumstance, it is hard to refer accurate legal basis and relevant fundamental theory. The core of this article is to try to find reasonable solution to resolve the inheritance about dormant partners’stock equity by using case study and integrating theory with practice. On the basis of this, the author hope a reasonable legal system can be established to handle with the complicated dispute about the silent investment in order to regulate the market economy.This article can be divided into four parts,about 20000 words in total.The first part deals with the original intention of writing and explains the reason why this problem is analysed. Firstly, it is a general introduction about adaptation case and the focuses on the key problems. Then, after an analysis on it, the relevant problems on how to define it clearly will be introduced.The following part is to expound and prove the shareholders’qualifications. In the first place, after determining the shareholders’nature, qualifications and the relationship between them, it produces a basic prerequisite about the shareholders’ right confirmation generally. Along with this, it can clarify the standards about shareholders’ qualifications and provide the reference standards and value orientation about relevant disputes.Part three is the key part to deal with the dormant partners’right confirmation and is also key and difficult problem of this article to straighten out. Through the interpretation on the basic and denotative concept about silent shareholder, it can be obtained the nature of silent shareholder. Referring to thoughts about the issue of dormant partners in the present law, theory and practice, along with the consideration about the mainstream versions, thoughts about how to define the dormant partners can be provided.The last one is the illustration and analysis about the inheritance of stock equity of dormant partners. It gives a review of stock equity and analysis the standardized stock equity’s inheritance at first. Then, according to the previous conclusion and standards about shareholders’ qualifications, it discusses the requirements about dormant partners’ stock equity inheritance. Following that, the way in which dormant partners’ stock equity can be inherited will be established. Hopefully, it will provide some theoretic support in the same or similar subsequent cases.The author of this article tries to find the generally instructive rules and specific ideas about the dormant partners’ qualification and stock equity inheritance on the basis of case study and plus the overall analysis about theory and legal practice. 【关键词】股权 股东资格 隐名股东 股权继承 【英文关键词】stock equity shareholders’ qualification dormant partners stock equity inheritance 【目录】有限责任公司隐名股东股权继承问题的实例分析 内 容摘要 6-8 Abstract 8-9 引言 12-14 一、问题之 缘起 14-17 (一) 案由 14 (二) 案例基本情况简介 14-16 (三) 案例争议焦点及其折射出的需要界定的实际问题 16-17 (四) 有关此案的现实状况 17 二、有限责任公司 股东资格的认定 17-22 (一) 厘清股东资格认定的基本问题 17-19 1. 股权性质的诠释 17-18 2. 股东资格的内涵 18 3. 股东、股权和股东资格之相互关系 18-19 (二) 股东资格认定的应然标准 19-20 (三) 结合案例之具体分析 20-22 三、隐名股东资格的认定 22-28 (一) 隐名股东 概述 22-25 1. 隐名股东的内涵及外延 22-23 2. 我国 对隐名股东资格确认的现状 23-25 (二) 确认隐名股东资格的 思路 25-27 1. 对实质说、形式说、内外区别说的考量 25-26 2. 确认隐名股东资格的出路—扩充形式说 26-27 (三) 结合案例之具体分析 27-28 四、隐名股东 股权的继承 28-38 (一) 股权继承综述 28-32 1. 我国现行法律对股权继承的规定 28-29 2. 有限责任公司股权的可继承性分析 29-32 3. 规范化的股权继承 32 (二) 隐名股东的股权可被继承的要件分析 32-34 (三) 隐名股东股权继承的途径 34-35 (四) 结合案例之具体分析 35-38 结语 38-39 致谢 39-40 参考文献 40-41 【采买全文】 1.3.9.9.38.8.4.8 1.3.8.1.13.7.2.1 同时提供论文写作一对一辅导和论文发表服务.保过包发 【说明】本文仅为中国学术文献总库合作提供,无涉版权。作者如有异议请与总库或学校联系。
/
本文档为【股权论文:股权 股东资格 隐名股东 股权继承】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑, 图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。 本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。 网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。

历史搜索

    清空历史搜索