108COMPARISON OF HPV

Short Communication Comparison of HPV type distribution in high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer: a meta-analysis GM Clifford1,*, JS Smith1, T Aguado2 and S Franceschi1 1Unit of Field and Intervention Studies, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150, cours Albert Thomas, 69008, Lyon, France; 2Department of Vaccines and Biologicals, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland Particular types of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection may preferentially progress from high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) to squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCC). We performed a meta-analysis of published data to compare HPV type distribution in HSIL and SCC. HPV16, 18 and 45 were each more prevalent in SCC than HSIL, whereas the reverse was true for other oncogenic types including HPV31, 33, 52 and 58. These data suggest that HSILs infected with HPV16, 18 and 45 preferentially progress to SCC. This may have implications for follow-up protocols of future HPV-based cervical cancer screening programmes and for HPV vaccine trials. British Journal of Cancer (2003) 89, 101–105. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601024 www.bjcancer.com & 2003 Cancer Research UK Keywords: Human papillomavirus; high grade intraepithelial lesions; cervical cancer; squamous cell carcinoma; epidemiology; meta-analysis � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Epidemiological studies have established human papillomavirus (HPV) infection as the central cause of invasive cervical cancer (ICC) and its precursor lesions (Walboomers et al, 1999). However, only a fraction of precancerous lesions progress to ICC. A strong candidate factor for differential progression is HPV type (Lorincz et al, 1992). Identifying HPV types that preferentially progress from high- grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) to ICC has implications not only for follow-up protocols in ICC screening programmes, but also for prophylactic type-specific HPV vaccine trials. For ethical reasons, final outcome measures in such trials will be the prevention of HSIL. However, it is important to know whether the HPV type distribution in HSIL is representative of those that go on to cause cancer. Articles presenting HPV type-specific prevalence data were identified from Medline. Studies had to include at least 20 cases of squamous cell or histologically unspecified cervical cancer (Clifford et al, 2002) and/or 20 histologically verified cases of HSIL. In this study, HSIL refers both to lesions classified by the Bethesda system, that is, CIN2/3, and those classified separately as CIN2 and CIN3. Studies had to use polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays to identify HPV, and to present prevalence of at least one type other than HPV6, 11, 16 or 18 (Clifford et al, 2002). This report includes 8594 squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix (SCC) cases (including 2725 of unspecified histology), as previously reported in Clifford et al (2002), and 4338 HSIL cases (1733 reported as CIN2/3, 1824 as CIN3, 729 as CIN2 and 52 as cervical carcinoma in situ)(detailed information on the HSIL studies is reported in the Appendix). Compared to SCC, cases of HSIL were more likely to be from (i) Europe and South/Central America rather than other regions, (ii) studies that detected HPV from exfoliated cells rather than biopsy specimens and (iii) studies that used ‘broad’-spectrum (MY09/11, GP5þ /6þ and SPF10) rather than other PCR primers (Table 1). Type-specific prevalence is presented for the 14 most common high-risk (HR) types identified in SCC (Table 2). As not all studies tested for all 14 types, sample size varies between type-specific analyses. Type-specific prevalence is expressed as a percentage of all cases tested for HPV, and thus represents the prevalence in either single or multiple infections. Overall, HPV prevalence was slightly higher in SCC cases (87.6%) than HSIL (84.2%) (SCC : HSIL ratio 1.04, 95% CI 1.03– 1.06) (Table 2). HPV16 was the most common type in both SCC (54.3%) and HSIL (45.0%), but was more prevalent in SCC (ratio of 1.21, 95% CI 1.16–1.26). HPV18 was also more prevalent in SCC (12.6%) than in HSIL (7.0%), with a ratio of 1.79 (95% CI 1.56– 2.10). HPV45 was associated with a ratio of 1.85 (95% CI 1.35– 2.91), similar to that of HPV18. All other HR types included in the analysis had ratios between 0.1 and 0.6 (Table 2). The SCC : HSIL ratios for the eight most common HPV types were additionally calculated within more homogeneous study subgroups: (i) studies that did not report any multiple infections (6558 SCC, 2182 HSIL), (ii) studies testing for HPV from biopsies (7128 SCC, 1483 HSIL) and (iii) studies using ‘broad’-spectrum PCR primers (5318 SCC, 3502 HSIL). The SCC : HSIL ratios were also calculated separately for HSILs classified by the Bethesda system and for CIN3 only. Across all these subanalyses, SCC : HSIL ratios remained consistent for HPV16 (range: 1.04– 1.25), HPV18 (1.46 –1.93) and HPV45 (1.20–4.61). HPV31, 33, 35, 52 and 58 were consistently associated with ratios of 0.3– 0.9, with the exception of HPV58 for biopsy studies (1.06, 95% CI 0.73– 2.08). Where sample size permitted, subanalyses were also stratified by region. When estimated from studies within Asia, Europe and South/Central America, respectively, there was no material difference in SCC : HSIL ratios for HPV16 (1.46, 1.17, 1.40), HPV18 (1.74, 2.02, 1.46), HPV45 (4.35, 1.39, 1.20), HPV33 (0.56, 0.62, 0.76), Received 29 November 2002; revised 14 March 2003; accepted 26 March 2003 *Correspondence: Dr GM Clifford; E-mail: clifford@iarc.fr British Journal of Cancer (2003) 89, 101 – 105 & 2003 Cancer Research UK All rights reserved 0007 – 0920/03 $25.00 www.bjcancer.com M o le c u la r a n d C e ll u la r P a th o lo g y HPV52 (0.39, 0.26, 0.64) or HPV58 (0.55, 0.24, 0.30). However, notably high ratios were observed for HPV31 in South/Central America (1.13, 95% CI 0.84–1.70) in comparison to Europe (0.41, 95% CI 0.36–0.48) and Asia (0.43, 95% CI 0.31–0.68), and for HPV58 in China (including Taiwan and Hong Kong) (1.27, 95% CI 0.85– 2.51) in comparison to non-Chinese Asian countries (0.37, 95% CI 0.27–0.58), raising the possibility of localised variation in the malignant potential of particular HPV types (Chan et al, 2002). Our findings suggest that worldwide, HSIL infected with HPV16, 18 or 45 are more likely to progress to SCC than HSIL infected with other HR types. This could be interpreted in two ways: either these types have a greater potential to induce fully malignant transformation, and/or these infections somehow preferentially evade the host immune system. Compared to other HPV types, HPV18 has been associated with increased oncogenic potential in cell culture, screening failures and poorer cancer prognosis (Hildesheim et al, 1999; Schwartz et al, 2001; Woodman et al, 2003). Thus, HPV18 enrichment in SCC may reflect its greater oncogenic potential. Given its genetic similarity to HPV18, this may also be true for HPV45. Conversely, compared to other HPV types, HPV16 infections are more likely to persist and progress to HSIL (Molano et al, in press). Both persistence of infection and progression to HSIL have been shown associated with HPV16 variants (Londesborough et al, 1996). Thus, HPV16 enrichment in SCC may be related to its greater ability to escape immune surveillance compared to other types. Even in countries with established screening programmes, women still die from rapidly progressing cancers that escape periodic examination. Given that HPV16, 18 and 45 appear to have greater progressive potential, and in the event that future cervical screening programmes include HPV typing, women infected with HPV16, 18 and 45 may require closer surveillance than women infected with other HR HPV types. The demonstration that the HPV type distribution in HSIL is not entirely representative of those that go on to cause cancer also has important implications for prophylactic type-specific HPV vaccine evaluation. This is because any beneficial effect identified by randomised trials from the proportion of HSIL preventable by HPV16 or HPV16/18 vaccines may be an underestimate of the beneficial effect on the prevention of ICC. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work reported in this paper was undertaken by Dr Gary Clifford during the tenure of an IARC Postdoctoral Fellowship from the International Agency for Research on Cancer. We thank Dr Massimo Tommasino for his critical comments during the preparation of the manuscript. Table 1 Distribution of SCC and HSIL cases by region and study characteristics Lesion No. of studies No. of cases Source region (% of cases) Cervical specimen for HPV testing (% of cases) PCR primers used (% of cases) SCC 78 8594 Africa (6.9), Asia (31.7), Broad spectruma (61.9) Europe (32.0), North America/Australia Biopsies (83.4) Narrow spectrumb (15.5) (13.0), South/Central America (16.5) Exfoliated cells (16.6) Combination/other (16.3) Type-specific only (6.4) Broad spectruma (80.8) HSIL 53 4338 Africa (1.8), Asia (16.7), Europe Biopsies (34.1) Narrow spectrumb (7.9) (52.4), North America (10.3), Exfoliated cells (65.9) Combination/other (7.4) South/Central America (18.8) Type-specific only (3.9) HPV¼ human papillomavirus; SCC¼ squamous cell/unspecified carcinoma of the cervix; HSIL¼ high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion; PCR¼ polymerase chain reaction; a‘Broad’-spectrum PCR primers include MY09/11, GP5+/6+ and SPF10. b‘Narrow’-spectrum PCR primers include GP5/6, L1C1/C2 and PU1M/2R. Table 2 Comparison of overall and type-specific HPV prevalence between SCC and HSIL cases SCC HSIL SCC : HSIL HPV type n HPV (%) n HPV (%) prevalence ratioa All 8550 87.6 4338 84.2 1.04 (1.03, 1.06) 16 8594 54.3 4338 45.0 1.21 (1.16, 1.26) 18 8502 12.6 4338 7.1 1.79 (1.56, 2.10) 33 8449 4.3 4302 7.2 0.59 (0.53, 0.68) 45 5174 4.2 2214 2.3 1.85 (1.35, 2.91) 31 7204 4.2 4036 8.8 0.48 (0.43, 0.54) 58 5646 3.0 2175 6.9 0.43 (0.37, 0.52) 52 5304 2.5 2153 5.2 0.48 (0.40, 0.60) 35 6223 1.0 2690 4.4 0.22 (0.18, 0.27) 59 4488 0.8 1636 1.5 0.55 (0.38, 0.97) 56 4493 0.7 2110 3.0 0.23 (0.18, 0.31) 51 4580 0.6 2171 2.9 0.20 (0.16, 0.27) 68 4148 0.5 1763 1.0 0.50 (0.33, 1.04) 39 3899 0.4 1841 1.1 0.35 (0.24, 0.66) 66 4799 0.2 1778 2.1 0.10 (0.08, 0.15) HPV¼ human papillomavirus; SCC¼ squamous cell/unspecified carcinoma of the cervix; HSIL¼ high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. aWith 95% confidence intervals. Comparison of HPV type distribution in HSIL and SCC GM Clifford et al 102 British Journal of Cancer (2003) 89(1), 101 – 105 & 2003 Cancer Research UK M o le c u la r a n d C e llu la r P a th o lo g y REFERENCES Chan PK, Lam CW, Cheung TH, Li WW, Lo KW, Chan MY, Cheung JL, Cheng AF (2002) Association of human papillomavirus type 58 variant with the risk of cervical cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 1249 – 1253 Clifford GM, Smith JS, Plummer M, Munoz N, Franceschi S (2002) Human papillomavirus types in invasive cancer worldwide: a meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 88: 63 – 73 Hildesheim A, Hadjimichael O, Schwartz PE, Wheeler CM, Barnes W, Lowell DM, Willett J, Schiffman M (1999) Risk factors for rapid-onset cervical cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180: 571 – 577 Londesborough P, Ho L, Terry G, Cuzick J, Wheeler C, Singer A (1996) Human papillomavirus genotype as a predictor of persistence and development of high-grade lesions in women with minor cervical abnormalities. Int J Cancer 69: 364 – 368 Lorincz AT, Reid R, Jenson AB, Greenberg MD, Lancaster W, Kurman RJ (1992) Human papillomavirus infection of the cervix: relative risk associations of 15 common anogenital types. Obstet Gynecol 79: 328 – 337 Molano ML., van den Brule AJC, Plummer M., Weiderpass E, Posso H, Arslan A, Meijer CJLM, Mun˜oz N, Franceschi S, the HPV Study Group (in press) Determinants of clearance of HPV infections in women with normal cytology from Colombia. A population-based five-year follow-up study. Am. J. Epidemiol Schwartz SM, Daling JR, Shera KA, Madeleine MM, McKnight B, Galloway DA, Porter PL, McDougall JK (2001) Human papillomavirus and prognosis of invasive cervical cancer: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol 19: 1906 – 1915 Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, Bosch FX, Kummer JA, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Peto J, Meijer CJ, Munoz N (1999) Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 189: 12 – 19 Woodman CBJ, Collins S, Rollason TP, Winter H, Bailey A, Yates M, Young LS (2003) Human papillomavirus 18 and rapidly progressing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Lancet 361: 40 – 43 Appendix Study methods and type-specific prevalence of human papilloma- virus by study and by region are summarised in Table A1. Comparison of HPV type distribution in HSIL and SCC GM Clifford et al 103 British Journal of Cancer (2003) 89(1), 101 – 105& 2003 Cancer Research UK M o le c u la r a n d C e ll u la r P a th o lo g y Table A1 HPV DNA PCR primers used to identify No. CINII/ CINIII/ HPV-specific prevalence (% of all cases tested) First author Reference Country source all HPV +ve cases CIS/HSIL Any 16 18 45 31 33 58 52 35 59 56 51 68 39 66 Africa La Ruche Int J Cancer (1998) Ivory Coast Exfol. cells MY09/11 49 0/0/0/49 77.6 30.6 10.2 0.0 6.1 8.2 8.2 4.1 0.0 0.0 4.1 0.0 2.0 0.0 de Vuyst Sex Transm Dis (2003) Kenya Exfol. cells SPF10 29 0/0/0/29 96.6 34.5 3.4 6.9 6.9 3.4 6.9 24.1 17.2 0.0 3.4 10.3 6.9 0.0 10.3 Africa sub-total 78 0/0/0/78 84.6 32.1 7.7 2.6 6.4 6.4 7.7 11.5 6.4 0.0 3.8 3.8 3.8 0.0 10.3 Asia Chan MKM Gynecol Oncol (1996) China Exfol. cells MY09/11 45 10/35/0/0 55.6 24.4 8.9 0.0 4.4 Chan PKS J Med Virol (1999) China Exfol. cells MY09/11 89 29/60/0/0 58.4 25.8 4.5 0.0 3.4 6.7 11.2 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 Wu CH Sex Transm Dis (1994) China Fixed biopsies TS-PCR only 34 13/15/6/0 76.5 35.3 20.6 0.0 5.9 Nagai Y Gynecol Oncol (2000) Japan Exfol. cells L1C1/L1C2 58 0/58/0/0 96.6 37.9 3.4 8.6 15.5 6.9 1.7 Saito J Jpn J Obstet Gynecol Pract (2001) Japan Exfol. cells L1C1/L1C2 38 0/0/0/38 100.0 34.2 18.4 0.0 7.9 7.9 13.2 34.2 0.0 15.8 0.0 13.2 2.6 0.0 2.6 Sasagawa T Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (2001) Japan Exfol. cells LCR-E7 137 0/0/0/137 91.2 35.8 2.2 2.2 9.5 2.2 13.1 10.9 2.9 0.0 5.8 7.3 0.0 0.0 0.7 Yoshikawa H Jpn J Cancer Res (1991) Japan Biopsies L1C1/L1C2 31 0/0/20/11 90.3 38.7 9.7 6.5 12.9 3.2 12.9 Oh YL Cytopathology (2001) Korea Exfol. cells pU-1M/pU-2R 42 0/0/0/42 73.8 40.5 7.1 7.1 19.0 Lai HC Int J Cancer (2003) Taiwan Exfol. cells MY09/11 141 0/0/0/141 63.8 25.5 1.4 4.3 9.9 11.3 Ekalaksananan T J Obstet Gynaecol. Res (2001) Thailand Exfol. cells E1 primers 40 10/4/26/0 65.0 7.5 15.0 2.5 Lertworapreecha M Southeast Asian J Trop. Med Public Health (1998) Thailand Fixed biopsies MY09/11 50 0/50/0/0 74.0 36.0 12.0 8.0 Limbaiboon T Southeast Asian J Trop. Med Public Health (2000) Thailand Fixed biopsies MY09/11 21 0/21/0/0 100.0 33.3 14.3 4.8 Asia sub-total 726 62/243/52/369 76.4 31.4 6.9 1.0 4.9 6.7 10.5 11.2 1.6 2.3 3.0 4.0 0.4 0.5 0.7 Europe Baay MFD Eur J Gynaecol. Oncol (2001) Belgium Fixed biopsies GP5+/6+ 97 42/55/0/0 82.5 56.7 6.2 0.0 0.0 6.2 6.2 2.1 2.1 0.0 2.1 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 Tachezy R Hum. Genet. (1999) Czech Republic Exfol. cells MY09/11 88 0/0/0/88 58.0 43.2 5.7 3.4 1.1 6.8 0.0 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.0 1.1 0.0 Sebbelov Res Virol. (1994) Denmark Fixed biopsies GP5/6 34 0/34/0/0 91.2 85.3 0.0 0.0 29.4 Bergeron B Am J Surg Pathol (1992) France Fresh biopsies L1 primers 53 0/0/0/53 92.5 56.6 3.8 1.9 Merkelbach-Bruse S Diagn Mol. Pathol (1999) Germany Fixed biopsies GP5/6 88 21/67/0/0 78.4 61.4 1.1 3.4 1.1 Meyer T Int J Gynecol Cancer (2001) Germany Fresh biopsies MY09/11 288 0/0/0/288 94.4 46.2 6.6 1.4 13.2 9.4 1.7 5.6 3.1 0.7 1.4 1.0 0.3 1.4 2.1 Nindl I J Clin Pathol (1999) Germany Exfol. cells GP5+/6+ 65 31/34/0/0 87.7 56.9 6.2 1.5 18.5 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 Nindl I Int J Gynecol Pathol (1997) Germany Exfol. Cells GP5+/6+ 85 0/0/0/85 83.5 36.5 2.4 5.9 12.9 Labropoulou V Sex Transm Dis (1997) Greece Fresh biopsies MY09/11 50 0/0/0/50 88.0 36.0 12.0 6.0 6.0 4.0 0.0 Paraskevaidis E Gynecol Oncol (2001) Greece Exfol. cells MY09/11 28 0/0/0/28 89.3 35.7 7.1 3.6 25.0 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sebbelov Res Virol. (1994) Greenland Fixed biopsies GP5/6 30 0/30/0/0 63.3 70.0 3.3 6.7 10.0 Butler D J Pathol (2000) Ireland Fixed biopsies TS-PCR only 27 0/27/0/0 85.2 70.4 3.7 3.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 O’Leary JJ Hum. Pathol (1998) Ireland Fixed biopsies GP5/6 20 0/20/0/0 95.0 95.0 0.0 0.0 Laconi Pathologica (2000) Italy Fixed biopsies GP5+/6+ 36 19/17/0/0 100.0 50.0 8.3 2.8 2.8 5.6 5.6 2.8 0.0 0.0 C o m p a riso n o f H P V ty p e d istrib u tio n in H S IL a n d S C C G M C liffo rd et al 1 0 4 B ritish Jo urnal o f C ancer (2 0 0 3 ) 8 9 (1 ), 1 0 1 – 1 0 5 & 2 0 0 3 C ancer R esearch U K MolecularandCellularPathology Zerbini M J Clin Pathol (2001) Italy Exfol. cells MY09/11 89 0/0/0/89 79.8 50.6 3.4 2.2 7.9 9.0 Medeiros R Proceedings of International Meeting of Gynaecological Oncology (1997) Portugal Fixed biopsies MY09/11 78 10/68/0/0 85.9 82.1 0.0 1.3 Bosch Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (1993) Spain Exfol. cells MY09/11 157 0/157/0/0 70.7 49.0 0.6 1.3 5.7 0.6 Kalantari M Hum. Pathol (1997) Sweden Exfol. cells MY09/11 164 69/95/0/0 82.9 36.0 7.3 7.3 10.4 Zehbe I Virchows Arch (1996) Sweden Fixed biopsies GP5+/6+ 103 55/48/0/0 95.1 50.5 9.7 1.9 7.8 9.7 1.9 0.0 7.8 1.9 0.0 Bollen LJM Am J Obstet Gynecol (1997) The Netherlands Exfol. cells CpI/CPIIG 91 24/64/0/3 97.8 36.3 4.4 4.4 18.7 5.5 7.7 2.2 4.4 1.1 4.4 3.3 Cornelissen MTE Virchows Arch B Cell Pathol Incl. Mol. Pathol (1992) The Netherlands Fixed biopsies MY09/11 89 16/73/0/0 88.8 52.8 6.7 12.4 5.6 Reesink-Peters N Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol (2001) The Netherlands Exfol. cells SPF10 216 44/172/0/0 97.7 56.9 13.9 19.4 11.6 8.3 Arends MJ Hum. Pathol (1993) UK Fixed biopsies TS-PCR only 40 20/20/0/0 60.0 50.0 10.0 0.0 Cuzick J Br J Cancer (1994) UK Exfol. cells TS-PCR only 73 12/61/0/0 91.8 63.0 20.5 26.0 16.4 2.7 Giannoudis A Int J Cancer (1999) UK Fixed biopsies GP5+/6+ 118 31/87/0/0 100.0 68.6 4.2 0.0 14.4 11.0 3.4 0.8 2.5 0.0 0.0 2.5 0.0 0.8 2.5 Herrington CS Br J Cancer (1995) UK Exfol. cells MY09/11 38 12/26/0/0 92.1 50.0 7.9 18.4 7.9 Southern SA Diagn Mol. Pathol (1998) UK Fixed biopsies GP5+/6+ 26 0/26/0/0 100.0 61.5 7.7 0.0 15.4 3.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.8 Europe sub-total 2271 406/1181/0/ 684 87.1 52.6 6.5 1.7 10.5 8.4 2.6 2.4 2.6 0.3 2.5 1.5 0.6 0.8 1.6 North America Sellors JW Can Med Assoc J. (2000) Canada Exfol. cells MY09/11 58 0/0/0/58 98.3 75.9 8.6 0.0 27.6 5.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Adam E Am J Obstet Gynecol (1998) USA Exfol. cells MY09/11 257 0/0/0/257 78.2 51.0 13.6 1.9 4.7 13.6 Aoyama C Diagn Mol. Pathol (1998) USA Fixed biopsies MY09/11 21 4/15/0/2 95.2 52.4 0.0 19.0 19.0 Schiff M Am J Epidemiol (2000) USA Exfol. cells MY09/11 112 70/42/0/0 77.7 17.0 4.5 1.8 22.3 4.5 16.1 4.5 4.5 4.5 12.5 4.5 2.7 6.3 9.8 North America sub-total 448 74/57/0/317 81.5 45.8 10.0 1.2 11.2 5.4 10.6 2.9 9.4 2.9 8.2 2.9 1.8 4.1 6.5 South/Central America Abba MC International Papillomavirus Conference Proceedings (2001) Argentina Fixed biopsies MY09/11 86 13/24/0/49 97.7 50.0 14.0 7.0 2.3 7.0 Alonio LV Medicina (B Aires) (2000) Argentina Biopsies GP5+/6+ 36 0/36/0/0 80.6 41.7 11.1 0.0 5.6 Lorenzato F Int J Gynecol Cancer (2000) Brazil Exfol. cells MY09/11 60 0/0/0/60 86.7 56.7 3.3 3.3 3.3 8.3 10.0 0.0 1.7 Bosch Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev (1993) Colombia Exfol. cells MY09/11 125 0/125/0/0 63.2 32.8 0.0 2.4 2.4 1.6 Herrero R J Natl Cancer Inst (2000) Costa Rica Exfol. cells MY09/11 125 0/0/0/125 88.8 44.8 5.6 2.4 6.4 3.2 9.6 7.2 3.2 0.8 3.2 7.2 0.8 3.2 0.0 Ferrera A Int J Cancer (1999) Honduras Exfol. cells MY09/11 83 36/47/0/0 80.7 34.9 7.2 3.6 8.4 4.8 7.2 1.2 1.2 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rat