J Physiol 588.21 (2010) pp 4177–4188 4177
Endogenous descending modulation: spatiotemporal
effect of dynamic imbalance between descending
facilitation and inhibition of nociception
Hao-Jun You1,2, Jing Lei1,3, Mei-Yu Sui1,2, Li Huang1,2, Yong-Xiang Tan1,2, Arne Tjølsen4
and Lars Arendt-Nielsen3
1Center for Biomedical Research on Pain (CBRP), College of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, P.R. China
2Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, P.R. China
3Center for Sensory–Motor Interaction (SMI), Laboratory for Experimental Pain Research, Aalborg University, Fredrik Bajers
Vej 7 D-3, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
4Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, N-5009 Bergen, Norway
In conscious rats, we investigated the change of nociceptive paw withdrawal reflexes elicited by
mechanical and heat stimuli during intramuscular (i.m.) 5.8% hypertonic (HT) saline elicited
muscle nociception. i.m. injection of HT saline caused rapid onset, long lasting (around 7 days),
bilateral mechanical hyperalgesia, while it induced bilateral, slower onset (1 day after the HT
saline injection), long-term(about 1–2 weeks) heat hypoalgesia. Ipsilateral topical pre-treatment
of the sciatic nerve with 1% capsaicin significantly prevented the occurrence of both the bilateral
mechanical hyperalgesia and the contralateral heat hypoalgesia. Intrathecal administration of
either 6-hydroxydopamine hydrobromide (6-OHDA) or 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT),
and intraperitoneal injectionof naloxone allmarkedly attenuated theHTsaline inducedbilateral
heat hypoalgesia, but not the mechanical hyperalgesia. Combined with experiments with
lesioning of the rostroventral medulla with kainic acid, the present data indicate that unilateral
i.m. injection of HT saline elicits time-dependent bilateral long-term mechanical hyperalgesia
and heat hypoalgesia, which weremodulated by descending facilitatory and inhibitory controls,
respectively. We hypothesize that supraspinal structures may function to discriminate between
afferent noxious inputs mediated by Aδ- and C-fibres, either facilitating Aδ-fibre mediated
responses or inhibiting C-fibre mediated activities. However, this discriminative function is
physiologically silent or inactive, and can be triggered by stimulation of peripheral C-fibre
afferents. Importantly, in contrast to the rapid onset of descending facilitation, the late
occurrence of descending inhibition suggests a requirement of continuous C-fibre input and
temporal summation. Thus, a reduction of C-fibre input using exogenous analgesic agents, i.e.
opioids, may counteract the endogenous descending inhibition.
(Resubmitted 25 July 2010; accepted after revision 7 September 2010; first published online 13 September 2010)
Corresponding authorH-J. You: Center for Biomedical Research on Pain (CBRP), College of Medicine, Xi’an Jiaotong
University, Xi’an 710061, China. Email: yhj@mail.xjtu.edu.cn
Abbreviations 5,7-DHT, 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine; 5-HT, serotonin; HT, hypertonic; IT, isotonic; KA, kainic acid; NA,
noradrenaline; 6-OHDA, 6-hydroxydopamine hydrobromide; RVM, rostroventral medulla.
Introduction
Pain originating from deep somatic structures, which is
often described as diffuse, dull pain, represents a major
concern for many pain patients. It is well known that
muscle pain can be felt not only at the site of the primary
muscle injury, but also involves the soft tissues that
surround muscles, including ligaments and tendons. In
contrast to many other somatic pain conditions, muscle
pain has been considered difficult to treat efficiently.
The potentially involved neural mechanisms, in particular
central mechanisms, of muscle pain are as yet sparsely
known (Graven-Nielsen, 2006).
Intramuscular (I.M.) injectionof hypertonic (HT) saline
(5.8%) is regarded as a valid experimental approach for the
investigation of muscle pain/nociception in humans and
animals. Since the 1930s, it has been shown in humans
that I.M. injection of HT saline into muscle, i.e. the tibialis
C© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation C© 2010 The Physiological Society DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.196923
4178 H-J. You and others J Physiol 588.21
anterior muscle, can effectively elicit pain not only at
the primary injection area, but also at referred areas,
typically to the anterior aspect of the ankle (Kellgren,
1938). Using laser Doppler technique on human sub-
jects, we recently showed a significantly enhanced blood
flow and skin temperature in both legs after unilateral
I.M. injection of 5.8% HT saline into the tibialis anterior
muscle (Lei et al. 2008). These results suggested a bilateral
spinal and/or supraspinal regulation, i.e. descending
modulation, caused by unilateral nociceptive stimulation
of deep somatic structures.
It is also well known that peripheral tissue injury
and inflammation may lead to pain associated with
enhanced responsiveness to noxious heat and mechanical
stimuli, i.e. hyperalgesia and allodynia, in animals as
well as in humans. It is generally considered that the
secondary hyperalgesia occurring outside the injured area
is mechanical, but not heat sensitive, and related to
dynamic changes in central neural mechanisms. Several
studies have demonstrated that central and peripheral
mechanisms involving complex signalling cascades under-
lie the induction and maintenance of primary and
secondary hyperalgesia in a number of models of pain
(Treede et al. 1992; Urban & Gebhart, 1999). However, it
is still unclear which components of the central nervous
system, i.e. the spinal cord or supraspinal structures,
contribute predominantly to secondary hyperalgesia, and
why secondary heat hyperalgesia rarely is described in the
literature.
Thus, we here systematically investigated the variation
of the withdrawal reflex evoked by noxious mechanical
and heat stimuli in conscious rats, in a condition of
muscle pain/nociception caused by I.M. injection of
5.8% saline. We demonstrated a time-dependent dynamic
imbalance of descending modulations: early onset of
descending facilitation and late occurrence of descending
inhibition, givingmechanical hyperalgesia and heat hypo-
algesia during HT saline induced muscle nociception.
With respect to the evidence for the late occurrence of
descending inhibition, a new concept of a ‘silent’ supra-
spinal discriminator with different triggering thresholds
for governing Aδ- and C-fibre mediated nociception has
been further put forward.
Methods
Ethical approval and animals
Male Sprague–Dawley rats weighing 260–300 g (10 weeks
age) were provided by the Animal Center of the College
of Medicine, Xi’an JiaoTong University, and housed
pairwise in plastic boxes under a 12:12 h light–dark cycle
(lights on at 08.00 h) at 22–26◦C with food and water
available ad libitum. All experiments were approved by
the Xi’an JiaoTong University Animal Care Committee
in accordance with the Committee’s guidelines for pain
research in conscious animals, and comply with the
policies and regulations of The Journal of Physiology
(Drummond, 2009). The animals were acclimatized to
the laboratory and habituated to the test boxes for at
least 1 h each day 5 days prior to testing. The rats were
used only once and killed at the end of the experiment by
intraperitoneal injection of an overdose of sodium pento-
barbital (200mg kg−1). All efforts were made to minimize
the number of animals used and their suffering.
Surgery for RVM lesions and intrathecal
catheterization
The sodium pentobarbital anaesthetized (40mg (kg
b.w.)−1) rats were mounted in a stereotaxic frame with
fixation of the head by ear bars and tooth plate (MP8003,
RWD Life Science Co., Shenzhen, Guangdong Province,
China). A mini craniotomy was conducted with a dental
drill in order to perform the intracerebral microinjection.
Before intracerebral microinjection, the rats were treated
with diazepam (5mg kg−1, I.P.) to prevent death due to
kainic acid induced status epilepticus and distant brain
damage (Ben-Ari et al. 1979). The rostroventral medulla
of the brainstem (RVM: anteroposterior −10.30mm
from Bregma, lateral ±0.5 mm from midline, dorso-
ventral −10mm from the cranium; Paxinos & Watson,
1998) was then bilaterally microinjected with 0.25μl per
side of either kainic acid (KA, 1 mgml−1, Sigma-Aldrich
Chemie Gmbh, Germany) or 0.9% saline. This intra-
cerebral microinjection was slowly performed with a
0.5μl microsyringe over a period of 2 min. After that,
the microsyringe remained in place for 5 min, and was
slowly withdrawn, and the skull was closed with dental
cement. A recovery period of 4 days was allowed, during
whichanimals’ behaviour andmotor functionwere strictly
monitored. Animals showing severe permanent neuro-
logical deficits andmotor dysfunctionwere excluded from
the remaining experiments.
Under sodium pentobarbital anaesthesia (50mg (kg
b.w.)−1), the intrathecal (I.TH.) catheterization was
performed using PE-10 polyethylene tubing (o.d. 0.5 mm,
i.d. 0.25 mm). The catheter was passed through a slit cut in
the spinal arachnoidof theT6–7 region, andadvanced sub-
arachnoidally to the areaof the spinal lumbar enlargement.
The length of the intrathecal section of the catheters was
around 6 cm, and the total volume of each catheter was
less than 4μl. The outer end of the tubing was firmly fixed
to the paravertebral muscles to prevent the inset tubing
from moving. The wound was washed with sterile saline,
treated with antibiotics, and the muscles and skin were
sutured by layers. The whole operation was performed
in strictly sterile conditions. After the catheterization, the
animals were put back in the box for recovery. The total
C© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation C© 2010 The Physiological Society
J Physiol 588.21 Descending modulation on pain 4179
recovery period after the I.TH. catheterization was 3 days,
and animal showing significant signs ofmotor dysfunction
were strictly excluded from the experiments.
Intramuscular administration of hypertonic saline
and other drugs administration
As elsewhere (Ro & Capra, 2001; Lei et al. 2008), a
volume of 0.2 ml hypertonic (HT, 5.8%) saline was intra-
muscularly injected into the gastrocnemius muscle of the
left (ipsilateral) hind limb in order to establish muscle
nociception. The injection site was in the middle part of
the gastrocnemius muscle, and the depth of the injection
was about 0.5 cm. The injection procedure was performed
manually and lasted more than 30 s. A volume of 0.2 ml
isotonic (IT, 0.9%) saline served as control.
Different doses (50–450μg kg−1) of naloxone (a
non-specific antagonist to opioid receptors, Dupont
Pharma, USA) were injected intraperitoneally in control
rats and in rats receiving intramuscular injection of HT
saline.
I.TH. administration of 10μg 6-hydroxydopamine
hydrobromide (6-OHDA, Sigma-Aldrich) or 20μg
5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT, Sigma-Aldrich) was
performed via the intrathecal catheter 4 days prior to
the I.M. injection of 5.8% saline. Both neurotoxins were
administrated in a volume of 10μl, and 0.9% NaCl
with 0.2 mgml−1 ascorbic acid served as vehicle. After
the administration of either neurotoxins or vehicle, the
catheters were flushed with 5μl of 0.9% NaCl. All intra-
thecal injections were performed manually within 30 s.
Experimental design
Experimental study groups were randomized and blinded.
According to the different experimental purposes, rats
recruited in the current study were randomly divided into
several individual groups; 8–10 rats randomly assigned in
each group were included for the investigation.
Measurement of mechanical and heat sensitivity.
Withdrawal thresholds tomechanical andheat stimulation
were measured for both ipsilateral and contralateral hind
paws (heel part) 30min prior to and 5–30min, 1–4 h,
and 1–7 days post the intramuscular injection of 5.8%HT
saline. Some experiments involving muscle nociception
elicited by I.M. injection of HT saline were performed after
4 weeks.
For the measurement of mechanically evoked
behavioural responses, rats were placed in different
individual Plexiglas chambers withmesh floors and trans-
parent covers (20× 20× 25 cm). An electronic von Frey
device (2290 Electrovonfrey, IITC, Woodland Hills, CA,
USA) was used to detect the mechanical paw withdrawal
threshold. The filament was applied to the heel part of
the hind paw according to the mapping of the withdrawal
field of the gastrocnemius muscle (Schouenborg &Weng,
1994; You & Arendt-Nielsen, 2005). The filament that
elicited a withdrawal response in 50% of trials was taken
to be themechanical threshold (g). A reduced or increased
threshold for the withdrawal response compared with the
threshold before the HT saline injection was defined as
hyperalgesia or hypoalgesia, respectively.
In addition to the von Frey evoked withdrawal reflex,
the Randall–Selitto test was performed in a part of the
experiments for further investigation and identification
(Randall & Selitto, 1957). Briefly, nociceptive thresholds
were measured with a digital paw pressure meter (probe
tip: 1 mm; cut-off pressure: 500 g; Model 2500, IITC) by
applying increasing pressure to the animal’s ipsilateral heel
part of the hind paw until vocalization.
Heat evoked paw withdrawal responses were
determined using a 390G plantar stimulator Analgesia
Meter (IITC). The rats were tested individually in a
Plexiglas cubicle placed onto a constant temperature
controlled transparent glass plate used to avoid
temperature sink from the tested hind paws. The heat
stimulus was a high-intensity beam (setting = 30–40%
intensity of full power) aimed at the heel part of the
hind paw. The withdrawal latency was defined as the time
from the onset of noxious heat stimulation to withdrawal
of the tested hind paw. The intensity of the beam was
adjusted so that the latency of the paw withdrawal reflex
was around 10–11 s in untreated animals. A painful, but
tolerable, sensation could be elicited using this 10–11 s
heat stimulation on the operator’s hand. To avoid excessive
tissue injury, manual cut-off of the heat stimulus was
performed if no paw withdrawal reflex could be evoked
during 20 s of heat stimulation.
Assessment of motor function. Briefly, animals were
placedonaRota-Rod treadmill (Model 755, IITC) rotating
at a gradually increasing speed from 5 to 30 r.p.m.
for 30 s and maintained for another 120 s at 30 r.p.m.
Rats with motor dysfunction after the chronic I.TH.
catheterization and the neurotoxic lesion with either
capsaicin or 6-OHDA/5,7-DHT were excluded from the
remaining experiments.
Topical treatment of sciatic nerve with capsaicin. Under
sodium pentobarbital (50mg (kg b.w.)−1, I.P.) and
lidocaine (local application) anaesthesia, the sciatic nerve
of the left hind limb was exposed, and a piece of cotton
soaked with 0.25 ml of either vehicle or 1% capsaicin
solution (Sigma-Aldrich vehicle: 10%ethanol, 10%Tween
80, and80%saline)was gentlywrappedaround1 cmof the
sciatic nerve for 30min as described elsewhere (Fitzgerald,
1983). One day after capsaicin treatment, the loss of
sensitivity to graded radiant heat confirmed the effect of
C© 2010 The Authors. Journal compilation C© 2010 The Physiological Society
4180 H-J. You and others J Physiol 588.21
topical application of capsaicin. Following confirmation
by the heat test, 5.8% HT saline was injected intra-
muscularly into the gastrocnemiusmuscle of the capsaicin
treated hind limb to introduce muscle nociception.
Histology for identification of KA lesion of RVM. At the
end of the period of behavioural testing (about 7 days),
the animals receiving KA lesion of RVM were deeply
anaesthetized by an overdose of sodium pentobarbital
(75mg kg−1, I.P.) and transcardially perfused with 10%
formalin. The brains were then isolated and stored in
30% sucrose for 2 days. Freezing serial sections (50μm
thickness) were cut in the coronal plane and stained with
Nissl stain, and were screened under a microscope (Leica,
Germany). Schematic reconstruction of the injection sites
and lesion area was drawn according to the stereotaxic
atlas of rats (Paxinos&Watson, 1998). Reported results are
based on observationsmade on rats with accurate location
of the lesions in the RVM. The histological analysis
of cannula tip location and lesion area was performed
without the knowledge of the behavioural results.
Biochemical analyses by high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC). As described elsewhere
(Tjølsen et al. 1991), using HPLC associated with
electrochemical approach (adjusted to 0.7 V verse the
Ag–AgCl electrodes) endogenous levels of noradrenaline
(NA) and serotonin (5-HT) in the lumbar spinal cord
were detected 1, 4 and 7 days after the administration
of the two different neurotoxic drugs. Results were all
calculated in nmol per g fresh spinal cord tissue.
Statistical analysis
All results were expressed as means± S.E.M. The data were
analysed using SigmaStat (Systat Software Inc., San Jose,
CA, USA) and compared by means of one-way/two-way
repeated measures ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni’s
test for analysis of the differences in the observation
time among different groups. P < 0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
Results
Changes of the withdrawal reflex elicited
by mechanical and heat stimuli during 5.8%
saline-induced muscle nociception
The bilateral paw withdrawal reflex to mechanical and
heat stimuli was evaluated 30min prior to, and 5–30min,
1–4 h and 1–7 days after the intramuscular injection
of 5.8% HT saline into the ipsilateral (left) gastro-
cnemius muscle (Fig. 1). During the first week after the
HT saline injection, the mechanically evoked withdrawal
reflex was significantly enhanced bilaterally (P < 0.05,
one-way ANOVA, Fig. 1A). In contrast, no significant
change of bilateral mechanically evoked withdrawal reflex
was observed during the exposure to isotonic (0.9%)
saline injection (P > 0.05, one-way ANOVA, Fig. 1A).
A significant difference was found in the mechanical
withdrawal reflex between isotonic saline and hypertonic
saline treatments (ipsilateral: F(10,180) = 2.26, P < 0.05;
contralateral: F(10,180) = 2.02, P < 0.05; Fig. 1A).
In contrast to the bilateral enhanced mechanical
responses, we did not find any significant changes of
the heat evoked withdrawal reflex during the initial 4 h
following the HT saline injection (P > 0.05, one-way
ANOVA, Fig. 1B). However, the latency of the heat evoked
withdrawal reflex was significantly prolonged bilaterally,
from 11.1± 0.8 s (ipsilateral) and 11.2± 0.8 s (contra-
lateral) (baseline response) to 17.3± 0.9 s and 17.4± 0.9 s
1 day after the HT saline injection respectively, and
lasted more than 7 days, indicating a HT saline-induced
heat hypoalgesia but not hyperalgesia (Fig. 1B, P < 0.001,
one-way ANOVA). A significant difference in heat
evoked withdrawal reflex was found between iso-
tonic saline and hypertonic saline injections (time
effect: ipsilateral: F(6,108) = 25.37, P < 0.001; contralateral:
F(6,108) = 26.62, P < 0.001; Fig. 1B). These decreased heat
evoked responses declined to the control level gradually
within 2 weeks (data not shown).
We further tested the nociceptive vocalization threshold
by applying increasing pressure to the heel part of the
hind paws before and after the HT saline injection.
Relative to controls that received 0.9% saline intra-
muscular injections, 5.8% HT saline injections caused
bilaterally facilitated vocalization responses for more than
the 1 week observation time (ipsilateral: F(12,216) = 2.14,
P < 0.05; contralateral: F(12,216) = 2.23, P < 0.05; Fig. 1C).
This suggested that the peripheral and centralmechanisms
underlying the modulation of the mechanical withdrawal
reflex and vocalization threshold probably share similar
neural modulating mechanisms.
In additional experiments,we testedwithdrawal reflexes
evoked by stimulation of the middle part of the forepaws
following unilateral muscle nocic