大学生在外租房

大学生在外租房 首先，观念问。对于中国而言，未婚同居毕竟不会被传统观念接受。有人说：呵呵，我们 现在“以身试法”，在打破传统观念。要知道，同居者行为总会被人知晓，俗语云：要想人 不知，除非已莫为。在尽人皆知的情况下，同居者如果能在未走进婚姻的殿堂，当然是美事， 可是有多少同居者不欢而散。那么你做好心理准备了吗？和下一任相处之前，你有没有必要 交待婚前曾经同居过？当对方知道你上学同居过。能否接受女性的处女情结和男性的被丢或 者不负责？虽然缘聚缘散皆是缘分，但有多少人能真正释怀？ 其次，同居的相关连带问题会接连不断，起码同居期间的责任是要负的，这个责任恐怕 不只是彼此身体取暖，同居了，自由就已不再，虽然很多人说，同居者彼此可以不负什么责 任，高兴就在一起，不高兴就散，多好，呵呵，能有多少同居者能有此心态？同居了，女人 多数是希望男生是她的未来。于是限制就自然而然的多了起来，爱情就是自私的，犹其是女 人，在同居期间能否把握好尺度。能否给对方以前一样的生活自由，如果不能，那么。对方 是负责任的还好，不想负责的呢？谁愿意被束缚呢，在这种情况下，也许，该分道扬镳了。 无形中同居产生了隐形压力，于是便由生理的压抑转换为心理的压抑。 另外，也是重要的一点。同居了对于学业而言，必然分散精力。有时还有经济问题。学 生有时能够自给。但是如果所创财富用于学业，用于提高个人水平，远比花费在同居上要好 的多。大学生，毕竟主业是学习。学习好坏已经不是个人问题，还有个社会责任，多学与少 学，最后可能是殊途同归，但是对于国家的综合素质的提高却有一定的影响。想一想，一个 白天用心读书，晚上依旧增加社会阅历或知识的人，其才如何？一个白天精神不振，晚上又 不能好好提高自已。相比之下。两者差距有多大！未来的社会建设有相当一部分要靠大学生。 不断提高个人素质是社会的需要。多多把精力用在学习上，于自身，于国家都是有利的。 有人说，学校应允许大学生同居，我认为不可，虽然大学生身体成熟，但毕竟承担着 学习任务。还有，现在校方没有允许大学生同居，可是同居现象已经屡见不鲜，要是政策允 许，后果还能想象吗？学生在呼吁校方人性化时候，请自已考虑一下：你的同居行为是否也 人性化？有多少个人责任和社会责任在里面？ First, the problem of concept. For China, unmarried cohabitation, after all, tradition will not be accepted. Some people say: Oh, we are "defying the law" in breaking the traditional concept. To know that cohabitants behavior will be known, as the saying goes: To people do not know, unless it is by day. In the well-known cases, cohabitants if you can not enter the palace of marriage, of course, cause for rejoicing, but the number of cohabitants broke up. You prepared to do it? And before the next live, you have no need to justify pre-marital cohabitation has been? When the other person know that you had to go to school living together. Able to accept the virgin women and men were lost or not responsible? Although the margin edge of bulk polymer are all fate, but how many people can really obsessed? Second, the joint problem related to cohabitation after another, at least during cohabitation is to bear the responsibility, I am afraid that this responsibility is not just another warm body, cohabitation, and freedom had not, although many people say that cohabitants can live with each other What responsibility, glad to together, unhappy on the loose, more good, huh, huh, how many cohabitants can have this mentality? Cohabitation, the woman in the hope of the future of her boys. So naturally the more restrictions on them, love is selfish, still its a woman, whether a good grasp of the union scale. Can you give each other freedom of life as before, if not, then. Fortunately, the other party is responsible, not responsible for it? Who wants to be bonds and shackles, in this case, perhaps, the separate ways. Cohabitation produced virtually invisible pressure, so he has repressed into physiological psychology of repression. In addition, also the important point. Cohabitation of the school, the inevitable distraction. Sometimes there are economic problems. Students are sometimes able to self-sufficiency. However, if the creators of wealth for the school, used to enhance the personal level, than to be better spent on more than cohabitation. Students, after all, the main industry is learning. Learning is not good or bad personal problems, as well as a social responsibility, and more learning and less learning, and finally may be achieving the same overall quality but for the improvement of the country there are certain extent. Think about a day and carefully study the night is still increasing social experience or knowledge, his only how? A daytime lethargy, Good night, can not raise themselves. Comparison. The gap between how much! The future of society depends on a considerable part of the students. Enhance the quality and the needs of society. Lot of their energy use in learning, in itself, is beneficial to the state. Some people say that schools should allow students living together, I think not, although the students physically mature, but after all bear the learning task. Also, now the school does not allow students living together, but cohabitation has been common, if policy allows, the consequences can imagine? Students call the school when humanity, please consider yourself: Does your cohabitation humanity? The number of individual responsibility and social responsibility in it?