ELSEVlER PII: SOl44-8617(96)00054-9
Curhoh,dm Polwm 31 (1996) 83-92
Copyright 0 1996 Elsevw Science Ltd
Printed in Great Britain. All rights reserved
0144-8617/96/$15.00 + .OO
Effect of acid hydrolysis on the molecular weight
of kappa carrageenan by GPC-IS*
David E. Myslabodski”, Dimitri Stancioffh & Ruth Anna Heckertta
“FMC Cor f., Chemical Research and Development Center, P.0. Box 8, Princeton, NJ 08543, USA
FMC Corp., Food Ingredients Division, Box 308, Rockland, ME 04841, USA
(Received 3 July 1995; revised version received 1 April 1996; accepted 8 April 1996)
Kappa carrageenan was subjected to acid-catalyzed hydrolysis under closely
controlled pH and temperature conditions. The effect of acid hydrolysis was
followed by measuring the change in molecular weight by gel permeation chroma-
tography (GPC) coupled to a triple detector system consisting of a single (90”) angle
laser light scattering (RALLS) detector, a viscometer and a refractometer. The
changes in the weight average (M,+) molecular weight of kappa carrageenan can be
described by a first-order random hydrolysis process involving selective attack at
carrageenan glycosidic linkages. Kinetic parameters are also calculated and a
general mathematical model is presented relating hydrolysis rate to pH and
temperature. The model was used to compare carrageenan molecular weight change
to published data on gel strength variation. Copyright 0 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd
INTRODUCTION
Carrageenans are water soluble polysaccharides extrac-
ted from red seaweeds. These biopolymers consist of
alternating 4-linked a-D-galactosyl- and 3-linked B-D-
galactosyl residues. The commercial types include
furcellaran, kappa, iota, and lambda carrageenans.
Structurally, they differ from one another by the
amount and location of ester sulfate, presence of pyru-
vate, or formation of a 3,6 anhydro derivative in the 4-
linked sugar. which occurs either naturally or is formed
chemically by alkali treatment of the native poly-
saccharide. These structural differences, along with
variances in molecular weight, account for the gelling
and other rheological properties that make carragee-
nans useful in food and other applications.
The functionality of carrageenans has traditionally
been evaluated by Brookfield viscometers and by
various gel testers (Marine Colloids, Stevens, etc.).
These tests, although very useful, give only an indirect
estimation of carrageenan molecular weight. A direct
measurement of molecular weight will improve our
understanding of the functionality of carrageenans. This
will enable better process control in manufacturing and
more effective product development.
*Presented in part by DEM at the Fall Meeting of the Amer-
ican Chemical Society, Washington DC, August, 1994 and at
The International Food Hydrocolloid Corzference, Columbus,
OH, September, 1994.
‘To whom correspo ndence should be addressed.
83
In this study, gelling carrageenans, kappa and iota.
were subjected to acid hydrolysis under various pH and
temperature conditions. The effect of acid hydrolysis of
carrageenans was followed by measuring the change in
molecular weight and intrinsic viscosity by gel permea-
tion chromatography (GPC). The GPC unit was
coupled to a triple detector system consisting of a single
(90”) angle laser light scattering (RALLS) detector, a
viscometer and a refractometer. In the present commu-
nication, we report the changes in the weight average
(M,) molecular weight of kappa carrageenan under
closely controlled conditions of time. temperature and
pH. A future report will deal with the results obtained
with iota carrageenan.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals
A sample of commercial kappa carrageenan (Gelcarin
GP 9 1 I, Lot 86 1304) extracted from Eucheuma cottonit’
was obtained from FMC Corp. (Food Ingredients
Division, Rockland, ME). Tri-potassium citrate mono-
hydrate, citric acid monohydrate, potassium chloride,
lithium nitrate, sodium azide and imidazole (all Purum
grade) were obtained from Fluka Chemical Corp. Nitric
acid (Reagent Grade) was obtained from VWR Scien-
tific. All reagents were prepared in distilled (Barnstead)
and polished water (Milli-Q System, Millipore Corp.)
84 D. E. Myslabodski et al.
and filtered through a 0.2pm (Gelman VacuCap)
bottle-top vacuum filter.
Hydrolysis reactor
Three (1 I) jacketed glass reactors were connected in
series and temperature was regulated by a constant
temperature circulator. The reactors were provided with
high torque (Caframo) mechanical stirrers and conden-
sers to prevent evaporation. Initial solution volume was
600ml. At each sampling interval, 100 ml of solution
were withdrawn.
pH was measured either on-line or at the time of
sampling. In the first case, a DPAS (Ingold) electrode
was mounted inside the reactor. In the latter case, a
Ross Sure-Flow (Orion) electrode was used. In both
cases, pH readings were corrected by an automatic
temperature compensator probe attached to the pH
meter (Orion 720A).
Hydrolysis procedure
The solution was formulated so it would be possible to
study carrageenan hydrolysis without interference from
carrageenan interaction with other components
normally found in food systems (i.e. proteins). It was
also required to quantitatively recover the carrageenans
for further GPC analysis. These conditions restricted
the formulation to a simple system, which consisted of
10 mM potassium citrate-citric acid buffer. Potassium
ion concentration was maintained at a constant 30mM
by the addition of the necessary amount of potassium
chloride. The potassium citrate level was that typically
found in food dessert gels. Solutions were prepared at
the required pH levels (room temp.) of 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7.
To minimize hydrolysis during sample dissolution
(see Singh & Jacobsson, 1994) 0.3g carrageenan was
initially dispersed in 500 ml of potassium citrate solution
and left to hydrate for I5 min. It was then rapidly
dissolved by heating in a microwave oven with occa-
sional stirring, and then added at temperature to the
reactor containing the citric acid and potassium chloride
solution. The contents were stirred for 1 min to stabilize
temperature and the first aliquot was then retrieved.
Subsequent samples were retrieved at the required times
(see Table 1). Time, temperature and pH were recorded.
The aliquot was split into two 50ml sub samples (one
retained, one processed) and quenched at -86°C (dry
ice in acetone). All samples were stored at -20°C.
GPC-triple detector system
The GPC system consisted of the following compo-
nents: A 201 glass reservoir containing the eluent, a
four-channel in-line degasser (Hewlet Packard 1050
Series), an HPLC quaternary pump (Dionex Model
4500) a high-pressure pulse dampener (Dionex part
Table 1. Sampling schedule (the times under 200 min include
the lag period between sampling and final temperature quench-
ing to stop the hydrolysis reaction)
Target
temp.
(“C)
55
75
95
Sample time
TO Tl T2 T3
(min) (min) (min) (min)
5 300 600 1200
5 64 94 184
5 9 14 24
No. 43945) a column oven (Perkin-Elmer Model
LClOO), a six-port sample injector (Valco Model C6W)
with a 100~1 sample loop (Valco), and a Viscotek triple
detector system. The injector was triggered by a micro-
electronic valve actuator (Valco). The columns’ bank
consisted of a TSK PWXL column guard and a set of
TSK-Gel Columns (300 x 7.8 mm connected in
sequence): G6000 + G4000 PWxL (TosoHaas). The
triple detector system consisted of a right angle laser
light scattering (Viscotek RALLS Model 600) unit, a
viscometer (Viscotek Model H502B) and a differential
refractometer (Knauer Model 298). All components
were maintained at 60°C. Data were acquired with an
A/D Data Manager (Viscotek Model 4000). Raw
signals were processed with TriSEC GPC Software
(Viscotek, Version 2.25). Samples were dialyzed to
minimize ionic aggregation prior to chromatographic
analysis. Polarimctry controls were examined to deter-
mine the onset of thermal aggregation. In order to
determine sample loss during a chromatography run,
eluent fractions were collected and analyzed for total
anionic hydrocolloid content following an established
procedure (Soedjak, 1994). Typical recoveries of about
90% were found. The development of the sample
preparation protocol and the operational conditions
during GPC will be published elsewhere.
Dialysis and chromatography eluent
Buffered 0.2~ LiN03 dialysis solution and chromato-
graphy eluent were prepared by dissolving 275.8 g of
LiNOs, 13.62 g of imidazole, and 5.Og of NaNs (as
preservative) in 2 1 of water and diluting to 20 1. pH was
adjusted to 7.5 with nitric acid. Eluent was stored in
containers having a 0.2g venting filter (PolyVent,
Whatman) to prevent particulate contamination.
Dialysis procedure
In preparation for dialysis, samples were thawed, the gel
was broken and a 5 ml sample was diluted with 5 ml of
GPC eluent and transferred into a dialysis bag (Spectra/
Por ” 3,500 MWCO, Spectrum). The bag was then
placed in a capped bottle containing 500ml of eluent
and equilibrated under constant stirring for a total of 4
days, with daily solution change. After dialysis, samples
Effect of acid hydrolysis on the molecular weight of kappa carrageenan by GPC-LS 85
were removed from the dialysis bag and stored in small
glass vials at 4°C.
Samples were dialyzed to convert carrageenan to the
lithium form. This eliminates gelling ions that would
interfere in the determination of molecular weight. The
use of the appropriate membrane resulted in a fast ion
exchange without sample loss (Knutsen et al., 1993).
Potassium and magnesium concentrations (data not
shown) were reduced to background level after a single
exchange. Due to its high affinity with carrageenan,
calcium required three exchanges for reduction to
background levels.
Polarimetry
Carrageenan conformational changes as a function of
temperature were measured by following changes in
optical rotation of the polysaccharide (Perkin-Elmer
Polarimeter Model 241 MC). Hot solution was trans-
ferred into the polarimetry cell (100 mm path length)
and left to equilibrate for 15 min between measure-
ments. The sample was prepared following the same
procedure as for the GPC samples.
It was determined (data not shown) that the onset of
thermal aggregation of kappa carrageenan in the GPC
eluent occurs near 30°C. The same type of experiments
were also carried out with iota carrageenan, which
indicated that the GPC experiments had to be carried
out at 60°C. To standardize the experiments, all GPC
runs were conducted at 60°C.
GPC sample preparation
Dialyzed samples were heated to 80°C over a 10 min
period under constant stirring and then successively
filtered through two syringe filters, 1 pm (glass fiber,
Puradisc 25GD, Whatman) and 0.45 pm (polysulfone,
Puradisc 25 AS, Whatman); filtered solutions were
stored in glass vials held at 65” C until chromato-
graphed.
Determination of molecular weight
The determination of molecular weight by light scatter-
ing requires an accurate determination of the refractive
index of the solvent. It also requires the measurement of
the specific refractive index increment (dn/dc) of the
solvent-polymer combination. The refractive index
value for the present solvent was found to be 1.334. The
dn/dc value was obtained by reference to the Pullulan
value of O.l47ml/g (Viscotek Corp., per. comm.). The
average value obtained for kappa and iota carrageenan
was 0.110 ml/g. In the calculation of molecular weight,
the contribution of the second virial coefficient was
neglected. In addition, the axial dispersion correction is
included as an integral component in calculations with
the Viscotek TriSEC software.
The procedure for using viscometric measurements to
correct the scattering data to zero angle with the
TriSEC software relies on an iterative process of calcu-
lation. An initial estimate of molecular weight, Mest, is
first obtained from the Rayleigh equation,
Me,, = R(d)IKc (1)
where R(8) is the light scattering constant for the right
angle light scattering detector, c is the injected concen-
tration of carrageenan, and
K = 2n2R1212/A4N~, (dn/dc)’ (2)
where A is wavelength, RI is refractive index of the
LiN03 solvent, NA is Avogadros Number, (dn/dc) is the
differential refractive index increment for carrageenan
in solution. This estimate of molecular weight is inser-
ted, along with the measured intrinsic viscosity, v, into
the Flory-Fox equation to obtain an estimate of the
radius of gyration, Rgest,
Rg est = [1/(6)“‘](7jM est /f)“j (3)
where f is the Flory Constant equal to 2.86 x 1023. The
estimated radius of gyration is inserted into the Debye
equation to estimate the angular scattering probability
function P(O),
P(B) = (2/x2)(e-” +x - 1) (4)
where x is (8/3) {(nRl)/n)Rgestsin(Q/2)}2 and 0 is 90”.
The estimated P(90) is used in equation (5) below to
calculate an improved estimate of molecular weight M:
A4 = MJP(90) (5)
The molecular weight calculation is iterated, beginning
with equation (3), until the values of M, Rg, and P(90)
converge.
RESULTS
Proper determination of the molecular weight of
carrageenans requires conditions that avoid aggrega-
tion. Aggregation will result in artificially high mole-
cular weight values. Aggregation is caused by inter-
molecular interactions that accompany conformational
changes in carrageenans. These changes depend on the
total ion content and on the temperature of the
system. The choice of hydrolysis buffer therefore
cannot be a fortuitous one made at random (see Perrin
et al., 1974; Gueffroy, 1975). The buffer should be
fully characterized regarding its pK values, buffer
capacity, dilution effects, temperature dependence and
complexing association constants with different coun-
terions.
The buffer should be an inert component in the
system and must not interact with the reactants. It has
to have enough buffering capacity to hold pH
constant during long periods of hydrolysis. When
86 D. E. Myslabodski et al.
working with systems at varied temperatures, the
change in buffer pH as a function of the temperature
(ApH/“C) must be known. Some buffers are known to
undergo large shifts (Gueffroy, 1975) due to changes
in individual ion dissociation constants. The addition
of the sample (carrageenan is a polyelectrolyte) and its
accompanying salts will also cause shifts in the pH of
the system. All of these facts underscore the necessity
of fully characterizing the buffer to be used in hydro-
lysis studies.
When operating at multiple temperatures and with
viscous samples, careful techniques must be used during
the determination of solution pH (see Bates, 1964:
Galster, 1991). Temperature compensated pH values
obtained under operational conditions are critical if
these values are to be used in the determination of acid
hydrolysis reaction constants.
The citrate buffer employed in the present study
(Table 2a) had minimal pH shifts due to changes in
temperature and the addition of carrageenan. The
largest shifts observed were between -0.22 and
+0.27pH units (Table 2b). Moreover, after a rapid
initial stabilization period, pH values remained constant
for all runs, even after 20 h.
The weight average molecular weight (M,) (see
Tanford, 1961, for a discussion of the different mole-
cular weight averages and distributions; Schroder et
al., 1989 for the various experimental methods) of the
different sample aliquots was obtained by GPC-light
scattering (LS). An independent determination was
conducted to obtain M, for carrageenan prior to
hydrolysis. The value found was 523 000 Daltons (Da)
(M,), which compares favorably with previously
reported values determined by GPC-LS (340-575, 353
and 690 kDa) for commercial kappa carrageenans
(Lecacheux et al., 1985; Slootmaekers et al., 1991;
Rochas et al., 1989, respectively). A typical elugram is
shown in Fig. 1. The elugram shows the reduction in
the molecular weight of the sample due to acid
hydrolysis as seen by a larger retention volume as the
hydrolysis proceeds. The M, values for the different
runs are summarized in Table 3a. It is noteworthy to
observe the very small loss of molecular weight at pH
6. The changes at pH 7 were even smaller. Therefore,
values obtained at pH 6 and 7 were not used in the
subsequent data analysis. Statistical and kinetic
analyses were performed with the JMP@ statistical
software package from the SAS Institute. The triple
detector system used in this study also gives an inde-
pendent measure of intrinsic viscosity, n, used to
calculate Rgest, as previously discussed. Values of n
corresponding to each determined value of M, are
listed in Table 3b.
A linear correlation was obtained between the reci-
procal of the molecular weight and hydrolysis time (l/
M, vs time). A typical result is presented in Fig. 2. This
represents a first-order random hydrolysis process
(Mark & Tobolsky, 1950). For such a reaction, the
kinetics of hydrolysis can be described by equation (6)
(Masson, 1955).
1 /M, - 1 /MO = kt/m (6)
where M, and M, (kDa) are the molecular weights at
time t and time zero, respectively, k (min-‘) is the
first-order rate constant, t (min) is the reaction time,
and m (kDa) is the molecular weight of the repeating
Table 2a. Buffer composition
PH 0.1 M Citric
acid (ml)
2.0 M KC1
(ml)
0.1 M Tripotassium
citrate (ml)
Water
(ml)
3 52.3 7.85 7.7 531.3
4 37.4 5.62 22.6 534.3
5 23.5 3.53 36.5 536.5
6 10.6 I .58 49.4 538.5
I 1.8 0.27 58.2 539.7
Table 2b. pH values for the 10m~ potassium citrate-citric acid buffer (constant potassium content).
Buffer values recorded without carrageenan. System values recorded in the presence of carrageenan at
operating hydrolysis temperature
Target
PH
Buffer Buffer System
pH at
(temp. “C)
System
pH at
(temp. “C)
System
pH at
(temp. “C)
3.0 2.95 2.98 3.00 at 59 3.10 at 78 3.11 at 84
4.0 3.98 4.02 3.89 at 55 4.03 at 75 3.98 at 85
5.0 4.96 5.07 4.66 at 54 4.14 at 75 4.78 at 85
6.0 5.97 6.18 5.81 at 78 5.87 at 85
7.0 6.96 7.15 7.23 at 74 7.22 at 85
Effect of acid hydrolysis on the molecular weight ofkappa carrageenan by CPC-12 87
90
80
70
60
SO
40
30
20
10
0
-10 c I ‘ 1 8
10 13 16 19 22
Elution volume (mL)
5
Fig. 1. GPC-RALLS &gram for the hydrolysis of kappa carrageenan at pH 4, 75°C. Sampling intervals at 5, 64, 94 and 184 min.
unit for kappa carrageenan (0.392 kDa). This equation
holds very precisely for all but the very lowest degrees
of polymerization (Mark & Tobolsky, 1950). The use
of the dimer as the weight of the ‘monomer’ in the
kinetic calculation is justified based on the very
different response towards acid attack of the two
bridging bonds in kappa carrageenan (see below).
Statistical data analysis indicated that pH and
temperature were key independent variables affecting
hydrolysis rate. The pH and temperature dependence of
the first-order reaction rate constant can be expressed
by equation (7):
LogkjpH, T) = LogA’ - BpH - C/T (7)
which at constant pH can be reduced to equation (8):
Logk(T) = Log A - E/2.303RT (8)
which is the well-known Arrhenius equation, account-
ing for the effect of temperature on reaction rates.
Figure 3 shows the good fit of the values from the
present study to the Arrhenius relation. The lines having
the same slope indicate that the activation energy, E,
(30 kcal) is the same for the hydrolysis reaction at
different pH values. The expected increase in hydrolysis
rate with increase in temperature is dearly seen. The
different intercepts on the Y axis correspond to the
different values