交通肇事逃逸论文：交通肇事逃逸致人死亡问题研究

交通肇事逃逸：交通肇事逃逸致人死亡问题研究 交通肇事逃逸论文:交通肇事逃逸致人死亡问题研究 【中文摘要】尤记儿时见过的一条标语——“要想富,先修路”,在这种政策的推动下,近20年来,我国的公路交通迅猛发展,全国公路总里程从1990年的103万公里到现在2010年的398.4万公里。公路四通八达了,GDP增长了,行驶在公路上的车辆也呈几何倍迅速增长,与此同时交通事故的数量也激增了,肇事后的逃逸行为也越来越普遍。伴随着交通事故逃逸现象的越演越烈,我国刑法和相关司法解释都对这种现象做出了相应的调整对策。但不论刑法还是司法解释都没能清晰的定义“逃逸致人死亡”的概念和内涵,理论界对此问题也颇有争议。针对这一问题,本文力图通过一则案例,剖析交通肇事逃逸致人死亡的内涵和外延,希望有益于司法实务中正确处理交通肇事逃逸案件。本文共有五个部分,约17000字。第一部分,案由。杨某交通肇事案。第二部分,案情简介。主要介绍杨某交通肇事逃逸的整个过程。第三部分,案件焦点。本案的焦点问题在于交通肇事逃逸致人死亡的认定。第四部分,争议观点。对于本案有两种争议观点:第一种观点认为杨某的行为构成交通肇事逃逸但不够成逃逸致人死亡,第二种观点认为杨某的行为仅仅构成交通肇事。第五部分,研究结论。作为论文的核心组成部分,作者在此处花了大量笔墨。这一部分又三个小部分组成。第一小部分,文章从交通肇事逃逸的定义、构成要件和法律属性三个方面出发对交通肇事逃逸的相关问题做了详尽的论证,得出结论:交通肇事逃逸是指行为人在明知发生交通事故后,为逃避履行救 助被害人的义务或者逃避责任追究而逃跑的行为。第二小部分在第一 小部分的基础上进一步从定义、构成要件和法律属性三个视角论证了 交通肇事逃逸致人死亡的相关问题,得出结论:逃逸致人死亡是指行 为人在发生交通肇事后,不履行救助义务、逃避法律追究而逃逸,致使 被害人因得不到救助而死亡的行为。第三小部分主要是运用已经得出 的结论对案例进行评析,得出案例中被告人杨某构成交通肇事逃逸, 不构成交通肇事致人死亡。 【英文摘要】I still remember the note I saw when I was a child-“To the rich ,first build roads”,in this policy,the highway traffic of our country developed rapidly in past 20 years,and the highway mileage had increased from 1.03 million kilometer in 1990 to 3.984 million kilometer in 2010. Nowadays,we have highway extending in all directions,sustainable growth of GDP,vehicle driving on the highway grow exponentially. And at the same time,the quantity of traffic accident increases heavily,the phenomenon of absconding from traffic accident is fairly general. As the phenomenon of absconding from traffic accident going worse,the criminal law and relevant judicial interpretation have made the appropriate adjustment measures to this phenomenon. But whether judicial interpretation or criminal law failed to clearly define“death caused by escaping”,controversy from theorists on this issue never end. To solve this problem, this paper does much analysis of connotation and extension about“death caused by traffic accident”through a case. Hoping it will be good for distinguishing cases about traffic accident in judicial practice.The paper has five parts,about 17000 characters.Part?,cause of action. The traffic accident crime committed by Yang.Part?,the case. The entire process of the abscond from traffic accident caused by Yang.Part?,the focus of argument on the case. The controversial view on the case is the nature of Yang’s conduct,whether it constitutes“death caused by escaping”or not.Part?,the controversial view. There are two controversial view. One view is that Yang’s conduct constitutes“abscond from traffic accident”but not“death caused by escaping”. The other view is that Yang’s conduct constitutes“traffic accident”only.Part?,the conclusion. As a core component of the paper,the author spend a lot of ink here. And this part is divided into three fractions. The first fraction, the article related to do a detailed demonstration to the“abscond from traffic accident”from three respects, which is the definition of the“abscond from traffic accident”, “constitutive requirements”and“legal attribute”. From the demonstrate we come to the conclusion that the“abscond from traffic accident”refers to the conduct that the escape performance of relief, as the thought or evade accountability act after the accident occurred. The second fraction further demonstration the problem that the“death caused by escaping” related issues from the“definition”,“constitutive requirements”and“legal attributes”basis on the first fraction. We come to the conclusion that the“death caused by escaping” refers to the conduct that does not fulfill the duty to rescue, evade legal proceedings, which causing the victims death of the late aid after the traffic accident. The third fraction, analysis the case concluded from the above conclusion. We come to the conclusion that in case the defendant Yang constitute the“abscond from traffic accident”, does not constitute“death caused by escaping”. 【关键词】交通肇事逃逸 逃逸致人死亡 现实危险性 【备注】索购全文在线加好友:1.39938848 同时提供论文写作和论文发表优质满意服务 本文为学术文献总库合作提供，无涉版权。作者如有异议请与总库或学校联系。 【英文关键词】Abscond from traffic accident Death caused by escaping In real danger 【目录】交通肇事逃逸致人死亡问题研究 内容摘要 6-7 Abstract 7-8 引言 10-11 一、案由 11 二、案情简介 11 三、案件焦点 11 四、争议观点 11-13 五、研究结论 13-28 (一) “逃逸”行为的界定 13-19 1. 交通肇事逃逸的定义 13-15 2. 交通肇事逃逸的构成要件 15-18 3. 交通肇事逃逸的法律属性 18-19 (二) 逃逸致人死亡的界定 19-26 1. 逃逸致人死亡的定义 19-21 2. 逃逸致人死亡的构成 21-24 3. 逃逸致人死亡的法律属性 24-26 (三) 本文对被告人杨某行为的认定 26-28 1. 被告人杨某的行为构成交通肇事逃逸 26-27 2. 被告人杨某的行为不构成交通肇事逃逸致人死亡 27-28 六、关于交通肇事逃逸的立法建议 28-30 致谢 30-31 参考文献 31