为了正常的体验网站,请在浏览器设置里面开启Javascript功能!
首页 > 安徽省某农村地区中小学生伤害与应对方式的相关研究

安徽省某农村地区中小学生伤害与应对方式的相关研究

2014-02-05 5页 pdf 398KB 32阅读

用户头像

is_616556

暂无简介

举报
安徽省某农村地区中小学生伤害与应对方式的相关研究 安徽省某农村地区中小学生伤害 与应对方式的相关研究 孙莹 陈明春 孙业桓 王铁柱 曹庆庆 顾超美 韩腾伟 张栋栋 孙丽娜 [摘要] 目的 了解安徽省长丰县农村地区中小学生伤害的流行病学现状,并分析其应对方 式等与伤害发生之间的关系。方法 整群抽取安徽省长丰县3所中学、5所小学,对其3~9年级 所有学生进行问卷调查。问卷包括一般情况、伤害发生情况以及特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)等, 用以调查伤害发生情况、评价学生应对方式等心理特点。采用负二项回归分析伤害发生的影响因 素。结果 共调查长丰县2917名农村中小学生,伤...
安徽省某农村地区中小学生伤害与应对方式的相关研究
安徽省某农村地区中小学生伤害 与应对方式的相关研究 孙莹 陈明春 孙业桓 王铁柱 曹庆庆 顾超美 韩腾伟 张栋栋 孙丽娜 [摘要] 目的 了解安徽省长丰县农村地区中小学生伤害的流行病学现状,并分析其应对方 式等与伤害发生之间的关系。方法 整群抽取安徽省长丰县3所中学、5所小学,对其3~9年级 所有学生进行问卷调查。问卷包括一般情况、伤害发生情况以及特质应对方式问卷(TCSQ)等, 用以调查伤害发生情况、评价学生应对方式等心理特点。采用负二项回归分析伤害发生的影响因 素。结果 共调查长丰县2917名农村中小学生,伤害事件发生率为17.4%。伤害组的积极应对得 分为33.98±6.38,非伤害组积极应对得分为33.66±6.37,两组差异无统计学意义(t=0.979,P= 0.328)。伤害组的消极应对得分(27.65±7.79)高于非伤害组消极应对得分(26.54±7.62)(t= 2.775,P=0.006),且消极应对高度、中度、低度三组的伤害发生率组间比较,差异有统计学意义 (x2=6.131,P=0.013)。多因素负二项回归分析显示,在控制人口学变量的潜在混杂作用影响后, 积极应对与伤害无统计学关联,中度消极应对者发生伤害的危险性是高度消极应对者的0.77倍 (IRR=0.77,95%CI: 0.63~0.94)。结论 消极应对是影响中小学生伤害的危险因素。改善应对 模式、促进人格发展是针对中小学生的心理干预措施。 伤害;应对方式;学生;负二项回归 Study on injuries and ways of coping to them among primary and middle school students in one rural area of Anhui province SUN Ying CHEN Ming-chun SUN Ye-huan WANG Tie-zhu CAO Qing-qing GU Chao-mei HAN Teng-wei ZHANG Dong-dong, SUN Li-na 1 Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China; 2 Changfeng Center for Disease Control and Prevention This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Research Project of the Educational Department of Anhui Province (No. KJ2009A79) and Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (No. 090413131 ). [Abstract] Objective To describe the current epidemiological characteristics of injuries among primary and middle school students in one rural area of Anhui province and to explore the relationship between the ways of coping and related injuries. Methods Through cluster sampling methods, all students from 3 to 9 grades in 5 primary schools and 3 middle schools in Changfeng county of Anhui province were investigated with questionnaire. All participants completed an anonymous questionnaire concerning their experiences with injuries during the 12 months preceding the survey. The ways of coping to injuries were evaluated by Trait Coping Style Questionnaire. Factors associated with injuries were identified using a negative binomial regression analysis. Results Of 2917 students, the annual event-based rate of injuries was 17.4 per 100 students. Positive coping score had no significant differences between the injury and non-injury groups (33.98 ± 6.38 vs. 33.66 ± 6.37) (t=0.979, P= 0.328). The score of negative coping style was higher in injury group than in non-injury group (27.65 ± 7.79 vs. 26.54 ± 7.62) (t=2.775, P=0.006). Statistically, the annual injury rates were significantly different in three groups on their negative styles of coping (x2= 6.131, P= 0.013 ). Data from the multivariable negative binomial regression analysis, after adjusted for demographic characteristics, showed no significant difference on the relationship between positive coping style and 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2011.11.014 安徽省高校省级自然科学基金(KJ2009A79);安徽省自然科学基金(090413131) 作者单位:230032合肥,安徽医科大学流行病与卫生统计学系(孙莹、孙业桓、王铁柱、曹庆庆、顾超美、韩腾伟、张栋栋、孙丽娜);长丰县疾病 预防控制中心(陈明春) 万方数据 injury incidence. Those with moderate negative style of coping had lower risks compared to those with highly negative one (IRR=0.77, 95% CI: 0.63-0.94). Conclusion Negative ways of coping was an important risk factor for injuries. Data from our research suggested that psychological preventive measure need to be taken to improve the style of coping. It was also important to promote the related personality development in planning the strategies for future prevention on injuries. Injury; Coping style; Student; Negative binomial regression 万方数据 拟合 万方数据 显示 万方数据 @@[ 1 ] Schnitzer PG. Prevention of unintentional childhood injuries. Am Fam Physician, 2006,74( 11 ) : 1864-1869. @@[2] Ma WJ. Study on the distribution and diseases burden of injury and relational risk behavior among residents of Guangdong province. Guangzhou: Guangdong Economy Publishing House, 2010. (in Chinese) 马文军.广州省居民伤害谱、疾病负担及相关危险行为研究. 广州:广东经济出版社,2010. @@[3] Wang SY. The operational definition of injury (suggestions for revision). Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2005,9( 1 ) : 96. ( in Chinese) 王声湧.伤害的流行病学界定标准(修改意见).疾病控制杂志, 2005,9(1):96. @@[4] Sun YH, Yu IT, Zhang Y, et al. Unintentional injuries among primary and middle school students in Maanshan city, Eastern China. Acta Paediatr, 2006,95 ( 3 ) : 268-275. @@[5] Wang SY. Injury epidemiology. Beijiug: People's Medical Publishing House, 2003. ( in Chinese) 王声湧.伤害流行病学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2003. @@[6] Sun YH, Yu DX, Huan ZH. Methodology study on injury epidemiology. Chin J Epidemiol, 2004, 25 (9) : 814-816. (in Chinese ) 孙业桓,余德新,黄子惠.伤害流行病学研究的若干方法学问 题.中华流行病学杂志,2004,25(9):814-816. @@[7] Wang XD,Wang XL,Ma H. Rating Scales for Mental Health (Updated Version). Beijing: Chinese Mental Health J Club, 1999. ( in Chinese) 汪向东,王希林,马弘.心理卫生评定量表(增订版).北京: 中国心理卫生杂志社,1999. @@[8] Zhou FL,Duan CR. Survey on studies of children left behind. Population J, 2006(3 ) : 60-65. ( in Chinese) 周福林,段成荣.留守儿童研究综述.人口学刊,2006(3): 60-65. @@[9] Zeng G, Geng YT, Jing RW,et al. Epidemiological study on injuries among children in Beijing. Chin J Epidemiol, 2006, 27 (12) : 1024-1028. (in Chinese) 曾光,耿玉田,荆瑞巍,等.北京市儿童青少年伤害流行病学调 查.中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(12):1024-1028. @@[ 10] Fan YP, Sun YH, Niu L, et al. Injury investigation of students in middle and primary schools in Maanshan city. Anhui J Prev Med, 2005,11 (2) : 95-97. ( in Chinese) 范亚平,孙业桓,钮丽,等.马鞍山市中小学生伤害调查.安徽预 防医学杂志,2005,11(2):95-97. @@[11 ] Zhang Q, Zhan SY. Systematic review on the rate for injure incident among elementary and middle school students in China. Chin J Epidemiol, 2007,28 (9) : 881-885. ( in Chinese) 张琼,詹思延.中国中小学生伤害发生率分析.中华流行病学杂 志,2007,28(9):881-885. @@[ 12 ] Prevention and Control of Chinese Preventive Medicine Association. Decision on criteria for defining of injury. Chin J Dis Control Prev,201 1,15( 1 ) :9. (in Chinese) 中华预防医学会伤害预防与控制分会.关于伤害界定标准的决 定.中华疾病控制杂志,2011,15(1):9. @@[13] Zhao KF, Fang XH, Su H, et al. Study on epidemiological characteristics and influencing factors of unintentional injuries among children left behind in Anhui province. Chin J Dis Control Prev,2007,11 (3) :277-279. (in Chinese) 赵柯伕,方雪晖,苏虹,等.安徽省留守儿童意外伤害的流行特 征及其影响因素.疾病控制杂志,2007,11(3):277-279. @@[ 14 ] Yao YS, Ye DQ. A case-control study on the risk factors of injuries in middle school students in southern part of Anhui province. Chin J Epidemiol, 2003,24 (7) : 581-584. ( in Chinese ) 姚应水,叶冬青.皖南地区中学生伤害危险因素的病例对照研 究.中华流行病学杂志,2003,24(7):581-584. @@[ 15 ] Sun YH, Yu IT, Zhang Y, et al. Unintentional injuries at school in China-Patterns and risk factors. Accid Anal Prev, 2006, 38 ( 1 ) : 208-214. @@[16] Zhang Y, Sun YH, Fan YP, et al. Negative binomial regression analysis of relative factors of unintentional injury among middle school students. Chin J Dis Control Prev, 2004, 8 (6) : 528-530. ( in Chinese) 张燕,孙业桓,范亚平,等.中学生意外伤害相关危险因素负二 项回归分析.疾病控制杂志,2004,8(6):528-530. @@[ 17] Jiang QJ. Recent researches on coping. Chin J Clinicians, 1999, 27( 11 ) :656-658. (in Chinese) 姜乾金.应对研究近况.中国临床医生杂志,1999,27(11): 656-658. @@[ 18 ] Votta E, Manion I. Suicide, high-risk behaviors, and coping style in homeless adolescent males' adjustment. J Adolese Health, 2004,34(3) :237-243. @@[19] Sun Y, Tao FB, Gao M. Suicidal behaviors and correlated psychological factors in secondary school students. Chin J Epidemiol, 2006,27( 1 ) :33-36. (in Chinese) 孙莹,陶芳标,高茗.合肥市中学生自杀行为与若干心理因素的 相关研究.中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(1):33-36. 2011-06-14 万方数据
/
本文档为【安徽省某农村地区中小学生伤害与应对方式的相关研究】,请使用软件OFFICE或WPS软件打开。作品中的文字与图均可以修改和编辑, 图片更改请在作品中右键图片并更换,文字修改请直接点击文字进行修改,也可以新增和删除文档中的内容。
[版权声明] 本站所有资料为用户分享产生,若发现您的权利被侵害,请联系客服邮件isharekefu@iask.cn,我们尽快处理。 本作品所展示的图片、画像、字体、音乐的版权可能需版权方额外授权,请谨慎使用。 网站提供的党政主题相关内容(国旗、国徽、党徽..)目的在于配合国家政策宣传,仅限个人学习分享使用,禁止用于任何广告和商用目的。

历史搜索

    清空历史搜索