Designation: D 629 – 08
Standard Test Methods for
Quantitative Analysis of Textiles1
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D 629; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
INTRODUCTION
Methods D 629-59 T, Quantitative Analysis of Textiles, were discontinued in 1969 because the
responsible subcommittee failed to recommend their adoption as a standard after several years of
publication as a tentative. The subcommittee action was based on the members’ knowledge that the
standard did not include several fiber types introduced to the textile trade after the method was
published, and that the techniques required for their identification were lacking in the text, allowing
it to become out of date. The procedures included in the text, however, are believed to be reliable for
the fiber types named and the techniques described are currently being used in the trade and are
referenced by other standards sponsored by Committee D-13 on Textiles. Reinstatement as a standard
using the previously assigned number was requested since the listed procedures were reliable and the
text considered to be the best available, though not all inclusive. Extensive editorial changes were
made in various sections in 1972, and the methods were reinstated as D 629-72. Editorial changes
have again been made throughout the text, and statements on precision and bias and suitability for
acceptance testing have been added.
The text of Methods D 629-59 T was published by the American Association of Textile Chemists
and Colorists in that society’s Technical Manual as “Test Method 20A-1959” issued in the years 1959
through 1974. The AATCC Method was revised completely in 1975 and since published as “Test
Method 20A-1975.”
1. Scope
1.1 These test methods cover procedures for the determina-
tion of the fiber blend composition of mixtures of the fibers
listed in 1.2. Procedures for quantitative estimation of the
amount of moisture and certain nonfibrous materials in textiles
are also described, for use in the analysis of mixtures, but these
are not the primary methods for the determination of moisture
content for commercial weights.
1.2 These test methods cover procedures for the following
fiber types:
1.2.1 Natural Fibers:
1.2.1.1 Cellulose-Base Fibers:
Cotton
Hemp
Flax
Ramie
1.2.1.2 Protein-Base Fibers:
Animal hairs (other than wool)
Silk, cultivated
Silk, Tussah
Wool
1.2.2 Man-Made Fibers:
1.2.2.1 Cellulose-Base Fibers:
Acetate (secondary)
Rayon, viscose or cuprammonium
Triacetate
1.2.2.2 Synthetic-Base Fibers:
Acrylic
Aramid
Modacrylic
Nylon 6, Nylon 6-6, others
Olefin
Polyester
Spandex
1.3 These test methods include the following sections and
tables:
Section
Referenced Documents 2
1 These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D13 on
Textiles and are the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D13.51 on Conditioning
and, Chemical and Thermal Properties.
Current edition approved Aug. 1, 2008. Published October 2008. Originally
approved in 1941. Discontinued in 2008 and reinstated as D 629 – 08. Last previous
edition approved in 1999 as D 629–99.
1
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
Section
Terminology 3
Summary of Methods 4
Uses and Significance 5
Sampling 7
Purity of Reagents 6
Moisture Content or Moisture Regain 9
Nonfibrous Materials 8
Mechanical Separation or Dissection 10
Chemical Test Methods:
Summary of Methods 11
Specimens and Symbols 12
No. 1 Acetate Mixed With Other Fibers 13
No. 2 Modacrylic Mixed With Cellulosic Fiber or Wool 14
No. 3 Nylon 6 or Nylon 6-6 Mixed With Natural Fibers or
Rayon 15
No. 4 Rayon Mixed With Cotton 16
No. 5 Wool or Polyester Mixed With Cellulosic Fibers or Silk 17
No. 6 Polyester or Acrylic Mixed With Wool 18
No. 7 Natural Cellulosic Material and Rayon Mixed With
Acrylic, Modacrylic, and Polyester 19
No. 8 Polyester Mixed With Olefin 20
No. 9 Polyester Mixed With Acetate or Nylon 6,6-6 21
No. 10 Acrylic Fiber or Linear Spandex Mixed With Nylon or
Polyester 22
Microspical Analysis
Scope 23
Summary of Method 24
Sampling 26
Apparatus 25
Procedure 27
Indexing Term 28
Table
Chemical Methods for Analysis of Fiber Mixtures 1
Solubilities of Various Fibers in Solvents Used in Chemical
Methods 2
Comparative Scale for Fineness of Various Textile Fibers 3
Fineness Ranges and Fiber Diameters of Various Textile Fibers 4
Specific Gravity of Various Textile Fibers 5
1.4 The analytical procedures described in the test methods
are applicable to the fibers listed in 1.2. The test methods are
not satisfactory for the separation of mixtures containing fibers
that fall within the same generic class but differ somewhat,
either physically or chemically, from each other. These test
methods are not satisfactory for the determination of bicom-
ponent fibers.
NOTE 1—For other methods of analysis covering specific determina-
tions, refer to: Test Methods D 461, Test Method D 584, Methods D 885,
Test Method D 1113, Test Method D 1334, and Test Method D 2130.
Methods for moisture are covered in Methods D 885, Test Method
D 1576, Test Method D 2462, Test Method D 2495 and Test Methods
D 2654. For the determination of commercial weight, refer to Test Method
D 2494.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:2
D 123 Terminology Relating to Textiles
D 276 Test Methods for Identification of Fibers in Textiles
D 461 Test Methods for Felt3
D 584 Test Method for Wool Content of Raw Wool—
Laboratory Scale
D 885 Test Methods for Tire Cords, Tire Cord Fabrics, and
Industrial Filament Yarns Made from Manufactured
Organic-Base Fibers
D 1113 Test Method for Vegetable Matter and Other Alkali-
Insoluble Impurities in Scoured Wool
D 1193 Specification for Reagent Water
D 1334 Test Method for Wool Content of Raw Wool—
Commercial Scale
D 1576 Test Method for Moisture in Wool by Oven-Drying
D 1909 Standard Table of Commercial Moisture Regains
for Textile Fibers
D 2130 Test Method for Diameter of Wool and Other
Animal Fibers by Microprojection
D 2462 Test Method for Moisture in Wool by Distillation
With Toluene
D 2494 Test Method for Commercial Mass of a Shipment of
Yarn or Manufactured Staple Fiber or Tow
D 2495 Test Method for Moisture in Cotton by Oven-
Drying
D 2654 Test Methods for Moisture in Textiles
2.2 AATCC Method:
20 A Test Method for Fiber Analysis: Quantitative4
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 textile, n—originally a woven fabric, now generally
applied to: (1) staple fibers and filaments suitable for conver-
sion to or use as yarns, or for the preparation of nonwoven
fabrics, (2) yarns made from natural or man-made fibers,
(3) fabrics and other manufactured products made from fibers
as defined above and from yarns, and ( 4) garments and other
articles fabricated wholly from one or more of the above
elements, and articles made principally from the above when
the products retain the characteristic flexibility and drape of the
original fabrics.
3.1.1.1 Discussion—Typical examples (but not a complete
listing) of materials included in the above definitions are: (1)
Natural fibers such as cotton, wool, sisal, and asbestos, also silk
filaments, after these materials have been subjected to their first
preparatory process, and man-made fibers such as rayon,
nylon, glass, and metals in the form of spinnable fibers,
2 For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website.
3 Withdrawn. The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced
on www.astm.org.
4 AATCC Technical Manual, available from the American Association of Textile
Chemists and Colorists, P.O. Box 12215, Triangle Park, NC 27709.
D 629 – 08
2
monofilaments, multifilament yarns, or tows; (2) Yarn interme-
diates such as sliver, roving, and top; yarn in single or plied,
spun or filamentous form; threads, cords, and ropes but not
metallic cables; yarn substitutes including twisted paper or foil,
slit foil, or slit laminated sheets, metallic or plastic monofila-
ments; (3) Products made from materials included in (1) or (2),
or both, by interlacing in any manner including weaving,
knitting, tufting and braiding, bonding, knotting, or felting and
including such products as cloths, woven goods, knitted goods,
lace, embroidery, nets, webbing, batts, and nonwoven fabrics.
Reinforced plastics and papers are not included; (4) Wearing
apparel, household, and industrial articles fabricated princi-
pally from one or more of the materials listed in (1), (2), and
(3).
3.1.2 bicomponent fiber, n—a fiber consisting of two poly-
mers which are chemically different, physically different, or
both.
3.2 For definitions of other textile terms used in these test
methods, refer to Terminology D 123.
4. Summary of Test Methods
4.1 Summaries of the specific methods used for different
tests are given in the appropriate sections.
4.2 The methods for fiber analysis are grouped under three
headings, as follows: Mechanical Separation or Dissection,
Chemical Test Methods, and Microscopical Analysis.
NOTE 2—It is assumed that the analyst knows from qualitative tests (as
directed in Test Methods D 276) what fibers are present and, therefore,
which method of analysis is applicable. The choice of method will depend
upon the nature of the material to be analyzed and, in some cases, on the
accuracy required.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 Test Methods D 629 for the determination of quantita-
tive analysis of textiles may be used for acceptance testing of
commercial shipments but caution is advised since information
on between-laboratory precision is lacking. Comparative tests
as directed in 5.1.1 or by Table D 1909 may be advisable.
5.1.1 In case of a dispute arising from differences in
reported test results using Test Methods D 629 for acceptance
testing of commercial shipments, the purchaser and the sup-
plier should conduct comparative tests to determine if there is
a statistical bias between their laboratories. Competent statis-
tical assistance is recommended for the investigation of bias.
As a minimum, the two parties should take a group of test
specimens which are as homogeneous as possible and which
are from a lot of material of the type in question. The test
specimen should then be randomly assigned in equal numbers
to each laboratory for testing. The average results from the two
laboratories should be compared using Student’s t-test and an
acceptable probability level chosen by the two parties before
the testing began. If a bias is found, either its cause must be
found and corrected or the purchaser and supplier must agree
to interpret future test results in the light of the known bias.
5.2 The effects of the various reagents used in the chemical
methods on the residual fibers in a blend depend upon the
history of the fibers and, unless otherwise stated, are generally
too small or too uncertain to warrant the application of
correction factors.
5.3 Fiber composition is generally expressed either on the
oven-dry mass of the original sample or the oven-dry mass of
the clean fiber after the removal of nonfibrous materials. If
nonfibrous materials are not first removed from the textile
before the fiber analysis is carried out, or if the treatments
described in Section 8 are incapable of removing them, any
such materials present will increase the percentage of the fiber
constituent with which they are removed during the analysis,
assuming they are soluble in the solvent used.
5.4 The analytical methods are intended primarily for the
separation of binary mixtures of fibers. These procedures may
also be used for the analysis of mixtures containing more than
two types of fibers by selecting the best combination of
methods to use (Table 1). Since a sequence of solvents on a
given fiber may produce different results than the expected
results from a single solvent, it is advisable to determine the
results of such sequential effects when testing multiple fiber
blends. It is sometimes more convenient to separate mechani-
cally the yarns in a textile which are of similar types, and then
use the appropriate chemical method to analyze each of the
components. Table 2 shows the solubilities of the various fibers
in different chemical reagents.
6. Purity of Reagents
6.1 Use reagent-grade chemicals in all tests. Unless other-
wise indicated, it is intended that all reagents shall conform to
the specifications of the Committee on Analytical Reagents of
the American Chemical Society, where such specifications are
available.5 Other grades may be used, provided it is first
ascertained that the reagent is of sufficiently high purity to
permit its use without lessening the accuracy of the determi-
nation.
6.2 Unless otherwise indicated, references to water shall be
understood to mean water conforming to Type I grade of
Specification D 1193.
7. Sampling
NOTE 3—It is not possible to provide specific instructions for all types
of textile materials to which these analytical methods may be applicable,
but a few general recommendations shall be followed.
7.1 Sampling for Acceptance Testing:
7.1.1 Lot Sample—As a lot sample for acceptance testing,
take at random the number of shipping containers directed in
an applicable material specification or other agreement be-
tween the purchaser and the supplier. Consider shipping
containers to be the primary sampling units.
NOTE 4—An adequate specification or other agreement between the
purchaser and the supplier requires taking into account the variability
between and within shipping containers so as to provide a sampling plan
with a meaningful producer’s risk, consumer’s risk, acceptable quality
level, and limiting quality level.
5 Reagent Chemicals, American Chemical Society Specifications , American
Chemical Society, Washington, DC. For suggestions on the testing of reagents not
listed by the American Chemical Society, see Analar Standards for Laboratory
Chemicals, BDH Ltd., Poole, Dorset, U.K., and the United States Pharmacopeia
and National Formulary, U.S. Pharmaceutical Convention, Inc. (USPC), Rockville,
MD.
D 629 – 08
3
7.1.2 Laboratory Sample—As a laboratory sample for ac-
ceptance testing, proceed as follows:
7.1.2.1 Fiber in Bulk—Take one composite sample from
each bale or other shipping container in the lot sample with
each such composite sample being taken from at least five
places in the shipping container.
7.1.2.2 Textile Strands—Take one package at random from
each shipping container in the lot sample.
7.1.2.3 Fabric—Take a full width swatch 1 m long or a
swatch long enough to contain one pattern repeat, whichever is
longer, from the end of each roll of fabric in the lot sample,
after first discarding a minimum of 1 m of fabric from the very
outside of the roll.
7.1.2.4 Garments—Take one garment at random from each
shipping container in the lot sample.
7.1.2.5 Other Textiles—Take one laboratory sample from
each shipping container in the lot sample as agreed between the
purchaser and the supplier.
7.1.3 Test Specimens—Unless otherwise directed in the test
method(s) of interest, prepare a test specimen having a mass of
TABLE 1 Chemical Methods for Analysis of Fiber MixturesA
Wool Spandex Silk Rayon Polyester Olefin Nylon Mod-
acrylic
Cellulosic,
Natural Aramid Acrylic Triacetate
Acetate 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Triacetate 3 (5) (75)B 9 39 (5) 9 (5) 3
Acrylic (6) (6) (75) 10 (8) 10 10 (57)
Aramid (6)
Cellulosic,
Natural
(6)5 (10) (6) (4) 5 5 (3) (2)
Modacrylic 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Nylon 3 (10) (6) 3 9 (8)
Olefin (6) (6) (75) 8
Polyester (6) (10) (6) (7)
Rayon 5 (6)
Silk 6
Spandex (6)
AKey to Methods and Reagents:
Method No. 1—80 % acetone(cold)
Method No. 2—N-Butyrolactone
Method No. 3—90 % formic acid
Method No. 4—59.5 % sulfuric acid
Method No. 5—70 % sulfuric acid
Method No. 6—Sodium hypochlorite solution
Method No. 7—Curpammonia solution
Method No. 8—Hot xylene
Method No. 9—90 % formic acid
Method No. 10—N,N-dimethylacetamide
BEach analytical method is identified by a number and where possible, two methods of analysis are provided for each binary mixture of fibers. The number or numbers
inside parentheses refers to the method that dissolves the fiber shown at the top of the diagram. The number or numbers outside the parentheses indicates the method
that dissolves the fiber listed at the left side of the diagram. Where two methods are listed for a specific binary mixture, the non-superscript method number represents
the method of choice.
TABLE 2 Solubilities of Fibers in Solvents Used in Chemical MethodsA
Method No.
(1) (2) (3) and (9) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (10)
80 % Acetone
Butyrolactone 90 %
Formic Acid
59.5%
H2SO4
70%
H2SO4
NaOCI
Solu-
tion
Curpam-
monia
Solution
Hot
Xylene
N,N-dimethyl
acetamide(A) RT (B) 75°C
Acetate S S PS S S S I I ... ...
Triacetate I PS PS S I I I ... S
Acrylic I S S I I I I I I S
Aramid
Cellulosic, Natural I I I I SS S I S ... I
Modacrylic I S S I I I I I ... I
Nylon I I I S S S I I I I
Olefin I I I I I I I I S I
Polyester I I I I I I I I I I
Rayon I I I I S S I S I I
Silk I I I PS S S S ... ... S
Spandex ... I I PS I I I ... ... S
Wool and Hair Fibers I I I I I IB S ... ... ...
AKey to Symbols:
S = Soluble
PS = Partially Soluble
SS = Slightly Soluble (a correction factor may be applied)
I = Insoluble
BReworked wools are soluble in 70 % H2SO 4 depending upon their previous history.
D 629 – 08
4
1.0 to 1.5 g by placing it in a weighing bottle. Place the
weighing bottle and specimen in an oven and heat for 1 h at a
temperature of 105° to 110°C. Transfer the weighing bottle to
a desiccator and allow it to cool to room temperature. For
fabrics containing a repeating weave pattern, include all yarns
in the pattern within the test specimen. Take the specimen from
other units when more than one unit is being tested or
analyzed.
7.2 Sampling for Other Purposes—In general, follow the
principles specified for samples for acceptance testing. Insofar
as the amount of material available and the purposes of the
analysis dictate, take a lot sample, laboratory sample, and test
specimens in such a manner that all fibers present have a
proportional probability of being sampled.
8. Nonfibrous Materials
8.1 Scope—These procedures are intended for the removal
of the nonfibrous natural constituents of the fiber and sub-
stances added by the manufacturer. Starch, China-clay, soaps,
some waxes, some nondrying oils, certain resins, and the usual
natural constituents are in this category and are removed by the
procedures described. However, general directions for the
removal of all possible substances which may be present
cannot be included. Inorganic pigments which are frequently
used as delustrants in the manufacture of man-made fibers and
types of dyes are not removed by the procedures described in
8.4. Some of the newer finishes present special problems and
the analyst will have to deal with these cases as they arise.
When it is necessary to modify the procedure to remove
nonfibrous constituents, the analyst shall make sure that
cleaned (Note 5) specimens of the fibers under consideration
do not lose weight when subjected to the same treatment. The
treatments desc