醉酒驾驶论文：醉酒驾驶 刑事责任 立法完善

醉酒驾驶论文：醉酒驾驶 刑事责任 立法完善 醉酒驾驶论文:醉酒驾驶 刑事责任 立法完善 【中文摘要】随着经济的快速发展和人民物质生活水平的提高,汽车进入越来越多的家庭,但人们在享受汽车带来的便捷时,安全隐患也随即上升。近年来,醉酒驾驶造成重大伤亡的恶性案件频发,引起了全社会的广泛关注。但是,同为醉驾肇事,不同案件的处理结果却大不相同。以2009年的几个来说,河南三门峡王卫斌醉驾造成6死7伤,被以交通肇事罪判处有期徒刑六年;广东黎景全和四川孙伟铭醉酒驾车,一审却被以危害公共安全罪被判处死刑,后二审改为无期徒刑。在广东、四川两起案件二审宣判当天,最高法院专门召开新闻发布会,统一醉酒驾驶案件审理裁判标准,随后又下发了《醉酒驾车犯罪法律适用问指导意见》,明确提出“无视法律醉酒驾车造成重大伤亡的,以危险危害公共安全罪定罪”。该《意见》的出台在一定程度上满足了公众对醉酒驾驶行为的痛恨之情,但是,《意见》对于没有造成严重后果的醉酒驾驶行为如何评价却没有涉及。而且由于《意见》对法定适用情形的规定比较模糊,在一定程度上影响了对醉驾犯罪定性的统一,并引发了一系列争议和思考。究竟醉酒对刑事责任能力有什么样的影响,现有法律能否准确、适当地评价醉驾行为,对醉驾肇事行为应当如何定性,立法上是否还有问题需要我们解决和完善?本文对醉酒驾驶行为在理论和实践中存在的上述问题进行了研究。全文共分三个部分,约3万字,主要内容如下:第一部分主要分析醉酒驾驶行为人的刑事责任。从醉酒的概念和种类入手,分析了各类醉酒对行为人刑事责任能力的不同影响,并重点论述了生理性醉酒情况下醉 酒驾驶人应负刑事责任的依据。第二部分主要从刑法角度探讨醉酒驾驶行为应当如何定性。实践中是以驾驶员血液中的酒精含量来判断是否属于醉酒驾驶,由于这是一个客观标准,而每个人的身体素质各不相同,对酒精的分解速度也不一样,因此就可能出现客观上已经达到醉驾的标准,但行为人并未完全丧失甚至并未丧失辨认和控制能力的情况。因此,笔者首先对醉酒状态下行为人可能处于的几种行为能力状态进行了分类,并结合行为人的不同心理状态分析了醉酒驾驶可能成立哪些犯罪。其次,笔者从分析醉酒驾驶行为的特性入手,论述了醉酒驾驶行为的高度危险性和严重社会危害性,探讨了醉驾行为人对造成危害后果可能存在的主观心态,并分析了我国和其他国家对醉酒驾车行为的处罚规定,同时简单回顾了近年来我国刑法关于危险犯规定的变化。通过横向和纵向的比较,说明新形势下醉酒驾驶行为给社会带来了大量的公共风险,刑法应当将醉酒驾驶行为纳入自己的视野。第三部分是对醉酒驾驶行为如何进行刑法规制的几点思考。首先列举了在司法实践中评价醉酒驾驶行为时遇到的主要问题,其次对目前提出的几种立法建议进行了分析,最后,笔者结合醉酒驾驶行为的特性,论述了醉酒驾驶行为单独入罪的必要性,并提出了完善法律的具体建议。笔者认为,随着社会的不断发展变化,醉酒驾车行为带来社会公共风险不断增加,应当将醉酒驾驶行为规定为犯罪,只要醉酒驾驶足以危害公共安全,即使没有造成严重后果也构成犯罪,如果造成严重后果则成立结果加重犯。 【英文摘要】With the rapid development of economy and improvement of people’s living standard, cars have entered the life of more and more families. However, when people are enjoying the convenience of driving cars, the security hidden problems also pop up. In recent years, malignant cases caused by DWI occurred frequently, which has aroused extensive attention in the whole world. But the verdicts of different cases by DWI are totally different. Take the following cases in 2009 as examples, in Sanmenxia of Henan province, Wang Weibin was sentenced to six years’ imprisonment for traffic accident causing 6 people’s death and 7 people’s hurt while DWI. In Guangdong and Sichuan. Li jingquan and Sun Weiming were sentenced to death for endangering the public security after DWI in the first trial and to life imprisonment in the second trial. On the same day of the two verdicts, the Supreme Court held a press conference to unify the trial standard of cases by DWI and issued Guiding Opinions on Issues Concerning the Application of Law to the Crime of DWI which put forward, “the people, regardless of law, drive while intoxicated and cause great casualties should be convicted on crimes against public security.” The issue of Guiding Opinions on Issues Concerning the Application of Law to the Crime of DWI. to some extent, relieves our hate for the behaviors of DWI. But it doesn’t involve how to evaluate the behaviors of DWI which don’t have serious results. Moreover, for the vague regulation of application, the guiding opinions influenced the unification on how to determine the crime of DWI and aroused a serious disputes and thinking. How the DWI influences the criminal responsibility? Whether the current laws could estimate the behaviors of DWI accurately and properly and determine the quality of the behaviors of DWI. And are there problems which need our solution and improvement in legislation. This paper makes a study on the above problems theoretically and practically. The whole passage is divided into three parts and about 30 thousand words. The following are the main contents:The first part mainly analyzes the criminal responsibility of the drunk driver. Starting with the conception and variety of DWI, this paper analyzes drunk driving’s different influence on doer’s criminal responsibility, focusing on discussing the evidence that the drunk driver should bear the criminal responsibility while physiological intoxicated.The second part mainly discusses how to determine the nature of drunk driving from the prospect of criminal law. In practice, we define drunk driving with the alcoholicity in the driver’s blood, which is an objective standard. However, people’s physical quality differs and thus the speed of breaking down alcohol differs, there comes the possibility that the doers, although has already reached the standard, doesn’t not completely lose or not lose the ability to make out and control. Therefore, the author first sorts out several ability states the doer may be in while intoxicated and analyzes the crimes of drunk driving, combining the doer’s different mentality. Then, starting with drunk driving’s characteristics, the author discusses drunk driving’s dangers and harmfulness, probing into the drunk driver’s possible subjective mentality, discussing China’s and other countries’ penalty provisions of drunk driving while simply retrospecting the changes about potential damage offense in our country’s criminal law. At last, through horizontal and vertical comparison, the author explains that drunk driving has brought a lot of public dangers to the society and our criminal law should bring the behavior of drunk driving into its sight.The third part is about some thoughts on how to make criminal regulations of drunk driving. The author first lists some main problems we may encounter when evaluating drunk driving in juridical practice. Then, the author analyzes the current existing legislative suggestions. At last, the author discusses the necessity to incriminate drunk driving and put forward some concrete suggestions to perfect our law. The author thinks that social public dangers brought by drunk driving are increasing as the constant development of the society so fast that we should regulate drunk driving as potential damage offense. As long as drunk driving has already endangered public safety, no matter whether it has caused serious consequences, it should be a kind of crime. If drunk driving has serious consequences, it should be a kind of aggravated offense. 【关键词】醉酒驾驶 刑事责任 立法完善 【英文关键词】Drunken driving Criminal responsibility Legislation 【目录】醉酒驾驶行为的刑法解读 摘要 4-6 Abstract 6-7 引言 9-10 1 醉酒驾驶人刑事 责任分析 10-19 1.1 醉酒人刑事责任能力立法概述 10-13 1.2 几种醉酒情况的刑事责任能力分析 13-19 2 醉酒驾驶行为的立法考量 19-28 2.1 醉酒驾驶案件定性分析 19-23 2.1.1 醉酒驾驶人的行为能力 19-20 2.1.2 醉 酒驾驶人的罪过 20-23 2.2 醉酒驾驶行为的入罪思考 23-28 3 醉酒驾驶行为的立法完善 28-37 3.1 立法检 讨 28-31 3.2 对相关立法建议的评析 31-33 3.3 具体 的立法建议 33-37 结论 37-38 参考文献 38-40 致谢 40-41 个人简历 41 【采买全文】 1.3.9.9.38.8.4.8 1.3.8.1.13.7.2.1 同时提供论文写作一对一辅导和论文发服务.保过包发 【说明】本文仅为中国学术文献总库合作提供，无涉版权。作者如有异议请与总库或学校联系。